I do not enjoy snow that much. I do not like the extreme cold either. I am alright if it is cold, but when it gets really cold, I do not enjoy the weather. I like sweatshirt weather or possibly weather in which all i have to do is wear a light jacket. I think thats pretty much the best weather. I would rather be cold then extremely hot and sweaty.
I also do not like the snow when it comes to transportation. You go outside, its extremely cold and it just snowed, and what do you have to look forward to? Your car is covered in snow, the ground around your car is surrounded by snow. First you try to get into your car. Usually it does not work the first time. You have to jiggle the handle back and forth until it pops the door open, and then there is a layer of ice in between the door so you have to pry it open. After you pry open the door, you get to step into a ridiculously cold car. I cannot turn my car on past the aux mode because my parking brake only works sometimes; therefore, I have to keep it in second. If I try to turn the car on with the heat, it will just roll away. So I have to deal with the unbearable cold. After brushing off your car, you get the idea that maybe, just maybe you can drive away without getting stuck. You thought wrong. You have to go into the garage, grab the shovel and continue to shovel away more snow. Once you are out on the road and everything is warmed up, you begin to slide around. So many accidents have occurred due to the snow. I do not like the snow because of these reasons.
But there are some positives I guess. I do quite enjoy sledding. Although I never get a chance to sled anymore, when I do, the cold is completely worth it. I also enjoy what the snow looks like. So I do find some positives in the snow. But by around February or March, it gets pretty old, just like summer.
Wednesday, December 1, 2010
Friday, November 19, 2010
The Raven Interpretation
Edgar Allen Poe is known for his dark and deep writing style. With various pieces such as The Raven and The Pit and the Pendulum, Poe has established a reputation in the literary community. His pieces reflect a darker style of Romanticism, which became popular among other Romanticist poets and authors. This style enables the readers to gain a deeper understanding of the author's true intentions. Although Poe is a definitive author, his works can sometimes be slightly over-glorified. Nevertheless, Poe is a reputable poet who has been commended for his dark Romanticist style of literature.
The Raven establishes a strong mood with vivid imagery. The main character of the poem was mourning the death of a loved one. This creates a grieving atmosphere to the poem. Poe relies heavily on imagery to convey his message. On page 257, Poe describes the dreary atmosphere: "Ah distinctly I remember it was the bleak December; And each separate dying ember wrought its ghost upon the floor. Eagerly I wished the morrow;-vainly I had sought to borrow From my books surcease of sorrow..." (Poe) This excerpt conveys the atmosphere and the main character's reasoning for basking in his books. In another excerpt, Poe describes the Raven's dark intentions: "Then this ebony bird beguiling my sad fancy into smiling,
By the grave and stern decorum of the countenance it wore,
`Though thy crest be shorn and shaven, thou,' I said, `art sure no craven.
Ghastly grim and ancient raven wandering from the nightly shore -
Tell me what thy lordly name is on the Night's Plutonian shore!'
Quoth the raven, `Nevermore.'" (Poe) In small piece taken from The Raven, one can see the melancholy and sorrowful atmosphere the raven has further antagonized. Throughout the literary piece, the raven continues to state the word "Nevermore" (Poe). This word creates an endless pit of the main character's emotions. The raven's ability to suffocate the protagonist with this word is quite commendable. Throughout the remainder of the piece, the raven continues to rest on the bust above the chamber door. The Raven effectively displays Poe's deep writing style and intentions.
Poe, Edgar Allen. "The Raven" American Literature. Columbus, Ohio: McGraw-Hill Companies, 2009. 229-230. Print.
The Raven establishes a strong mood with vivid imagery. The main character of the poem was mourning the death of a loved one. This creates a grieving atmosphere to the poem. Poe relies heavily on imagery to convey his message. On page 257, Poe describes the dreary atmosphere: "Ah distinctly I remember it was the bleak December; And each separate dying ember wrought its ghost upon the floor. Eagerly I wished the morrow;-vainly I had sought to borrow From my books surcease of sorrow..." (Poe) This excerpt conveys the atmosphere and the main character's reasoning for basking in his books. In another excerpt, Poe describes the Raven's dark intentions: "Then this ebony bird beguiling my sad fancy into smiling,
By the grave and stern decorum of the countenance it wore,
`Though thy crest be shorn and shaven, thou,' I said, `art sure no craven.
Ghastly grim and ancient raven wandering from the nightly shore -
Tell me what thy lordly name is on the Night's Plutonian shore!'
Quoth the raven, `Nevermore.'" (Poe) In small piece taken from The Raven, one can see the melancholy and sorrowful atmosphere the raven has further antagonized. Throughout the literary piece, the raven continues to state the word "Nevermore" (Poe). This word creates an endless pit of the main character's emotions. The raven's ability to suffocate the protagonist with this word is quite commendable. Throughout the remainder of the piece, the raven continues to rest on the bust above the chamber door. The Raven effectively displays Poe's deep writing style and intentions.
Poe, Edgar Allen. "The Raven" American Literature. Columbus, Ohio: McGraw-Hill Companies, 2009. 229-230. Print.
Journal #24: Mind Playing Tricks
There has been multiple times when my mind has played tricks on me. I am always paranoid of some weird paranormal occurrence in my house. I do believe in paranormal occurrences so I guess I have it coming for me. I am always watching paranormal shows because I feel that they are extremely interesting. I would not mind going on a paranormal investigation. I believe it would be extremely entertaining and pretty much an adrenaline rush. Because of this, I believe that I am slightly more paranoid then someone who does not believe in the paranormal whatsoever.
If I remember right, my house used to be an old hospital. This alone is slightly creepy and just really odd. I would really not like to see what happened in my house when it was a running hospital. Apparently my house was connected to the one next to me, which would explain why it looks quite similar.
There would be nights where I would feel as if someone was watching me or walking right by me. I would here papers rustling around the hallway, even though there were no papers anywhere. There were cold spots with gusts of wind that would just hit me at odd times. Doors would close and I would here random steps. I truly though that my house was haunted. Probably the worst night though was when I was watching a movie or something and I heard this super loud bang. This noise actually ended up being the attic door opening and slamming shut. This was the creepiest thing I have ever heard or been through. I was really uneasy because of that. After this, my brother and I would just stay in the same room because we were so uneasy. On the last night that anything ever happened, my brother and I were just playing music and talking and then we heard this ridiculous scratching on the door. We started laughing because we thought it was my dad or something because he was making fun of us for it, but he was gone. It was the weirdest experience I have ever had to deal with in my entire life.
If I remember right, my house used to be an old hospital. This alone is slightly creepy and just really odd. I would really not like to see what happened in my house when it was a running hospital. Apparently my house was connected to the one next to me, which would explain why it looks quite similar.
There would be nights where I would feel as if someone was watching me or walking right by me. I would here papers rustling around the hallway, even though there were no papers anywhere. There were cold spots with gusts of wind that would just hit me at odd times. Doors would close and I would here random steps. I truly though that my house was haunted. Probably the worst night though was when I was watching a movie or something and I heard this super loud bang. This noise actually ended up being the attic door opening and slamming shut. This was the creepiest thing I have ever heard or been through. I was really uneasy because of that. After this, my brother and I would just stay in the same room because we were so uneasy. On the last night that anything ever happened, my brother and I were just playing music and talking and then we heard this ridiculous scratching on the door. We started laughing because we thought it was my dad or something because he was making fun of us for it, but he was gone. It was the weirdest experience I have ever had to deal with in my entire life.
Emerson
This essay focused on the main points which many modern critics attribute to Emerson's transition from Romantic to non-Romantic. These points are revealed alongside claims that state Emerson's early writings and beliefs should be treated more as a "personal exorcism" than a philosophy to be taken seriously, specifically because of the reasons portrayed in Emerson's later rejection of Romanticism.
Based on the beliefs of Romanticism and Transcendentalism, Emerson refused to mourn, even over the deaths of his mother and brother (Edmundson). Emerson somehow linked the act of mourning to conformity, and therefore refused to take part in it; to Emerson, mourning would mean wasting time by focusing on traditional customs and values instead of finding one's "inner self", and would therefore break the true beliefs of Romanticism, and specifically Transcendentalism, which are against anything to do with conformity (Edmundson).
Emerson also denounced self-reformation through religious, social, or literary forms because they are external forms, and the only way to really find one's true self is purely through one's entire self (Edmundson). To rely or depend on something or someone else is to start the phase of mourning, and by this definition, Emerson's essay "Self-Reliance" is a paradox because he is intentionally influencing his own beliefs on the reader for him or her to adopt (Edmundson).
Edmund also points out another deep flaw in Emerson's beliefs: the never-ending circle or "perpetual motion" in which Emerson basically creates by disowning any form of "mourning", which excludes quite a bit by his definition, and advising one to solely function in the moment of "transition" (Edmundson). In Emersonian terms, this transition is the moment where the mind has stopped between the past and ability to enter into a new state, when all of one's energies have been invested in creativity (Edmundson). Since this is basically the only thing that Emerson does not deem as a state of mourning, he seems to encourage one to exist in this state. Existing in this state is fruitless though, and therefore a pointless circle of invested energy in random creative ideas and philosophies about reinventing one's self. No progress can be made in this state because one can not truly commit his or herself to one set of ideas or rule due to the fact that this would contradict ideas of Romanticism or Transcendentalism (Edmundson).
To further reveal more flaws of Emerson's system, Edmundson compares him to Freud. Freud and Emerson are similar in that they both discourage the attachment to one single thing in life, but different in that Freud is aware that the human ego cannot be stopped to continue relying, even a tiny bit, on "our first crucial attachments", and Emerson underestimates this stubborn tendency of the ego (Edmundson). Edmunson states that Emerson began to later realize this, perhaps due to the death of his son, and attempted to alter his system a little bit in regard to these flaws by accepting the laws of fate (Edmundson). The total effect of his son's death on him is ultimately what alters his beliefs and stubborn claims against any ideas related to mourning. Shown by works of his after this point in his life, he began a new system of "redeeming grief" (Edmundson). Instead of attempting to sever all ties with any type of mourning, Emerson begins to attempt to recreate the actions of fate, basically to be able to feel that he is in control of the actions and feelings that follow them, and therefore not committing to a true act of mourning (Edmundson). By doing this, he is attempting to prove to himself that spirit can define nature more powerfully than nature can define spirit. In the end, Edmundson has defined this as a "self-destroying self-invention" and the possible force behind Romanticism.
Recognizing the flaws and tragedies that are created within the system of beliefs and regulations of Romanticism and Transcendentalism explains why Emerson had to reject Romanticism in his later years. His loss of his son was the ultimate force behind his rejection because it forced to him to rethink all his beliefs as well as his stubborn stance on the idea of mourning. There were too many flaws within these beliefs that contradicted each other and proved to be non-progressive and unsuccessful in terms of Romanticism.
Works Cited
Edmundson, Mark."Emerson and the Work of Melancholia." Raritan (Spring 1987). Quoted as
"Emerson and the Work of Melancholia" in Bloom, Harold, ed. Ralph Waldo Emerson,
Updated Edition, Bloom's Modern Critical Views. New York: Chelsea House Publishing,
2006. Bloom's Literary Reference Online. Facts On File, Inc. 11 Nov 2010.
Based on the beliefs of Romanticism and Transcendentalism, Emerson refused to mourn, even over the deaths of his mother and brother (Edmundson). Emerson somehow linked the act of mourning to conformity, and therefore refused to take part in it; to Emerson, mourning would mean wasting time by focusing on traditional customs and values instead of finding one's "inner self", and would therefore break the true beliefs of Romanticism, and specifically Transcendentalism, which are against anything to do with conformity (Edmundson).
Emerson also denounced self-reformation through religious, social, or literary forms because they are external forms, and the only way to really find one's true self is purely through one's entire self (Edmundson). To rely or depend on something or someone else is to start the phase of mourning, and by this definition, Emerson's essay "Self-Reliance" is a paradox because he is intentionally influencing his own beliefs on the reader for him or her to adopt (Edmundson).
Edmund also points out another deep flaw in Emerson's beliefs: the never-ending circle or "perpetual motion" in which Emerson basically creates by disowning any form of "mourning", which excludes quite a bit by his definition, and advising one to solely function in the moment of "transition" (Edmundson). In Emersonian terms, this transition is the moment where the mind has stopped between the past and ability to enter into a new state, when all of one's energies have been invested in creativity (Edmundson). Since this is basically the only thing that Emerson does not deem as a state of mourning, he seems to encourage one to exist in this state. Existing in this state is fruitless though, and therefore a pointless circle of invested energy in random creative ideas and philosophies about reinventing one's self. No progress can be made in this state because one can not truly commit his or herself to one set of ideas or rule due to the fact that this would contradict ideas of Romanticism or Transcendentalism (Edmundson).
To further reveal more flaws of Emerson's system, Edmundson compares him to Freud. Freud and Emerson are similar in that they both discourage the attachment to one single thing in life, but different in that Freud is aware that the human ego cannot be stopped to continue relying, even a tiny bit, on "our first crucial attachments", and Emerson underestimates this stubborn tendency of the ego (Edmundson). Edmunson states that Emerson began to later realize this, perhaps due to the death of his son, and attempted to alter his system a little bit in regard to these flaws by accepting the laws of fate (Edmundson). The total effect of his son's death on him is ultimately what alters his beliefs and stubborn claims against any ideas related to mourning. Shown by works of his after this point in his life, he began a new system of "redeeming grief" (Edmundson). Instead of attempting to sever all ties with any type of mourning, Emerson begins to attempt to recreate the actions of fate, basically to be able to feel that he is in control of the actions and feelings that follow them, and therefore not committing to a true act of mourning (Edmundson). By doing this, he is attempting to prove to himself that spirit can define nature more powerfully than nature can define spirit. In the end, Edmundson has defined this as a "self-destroying self-invention" and the possible force behind Romanticism.
Recognizing the flaws and tragedies that are created within the system of beliefs and regulations of Romanticism and Transcendentalism explains why Emerson had to reject Romanticism in his later years. His loss of his son was the ultimate force behind his rejection because it forced to him to rethink all his beliefs as well as his stubborn stance on the idea of mourning. There were too many flaws within these beliefs that contradicted each other and proved to be non-progressive and unsuccessful in terms of Romanticism.
Works Cited
Edmundson, Mark."Emerson and the Work of Melancholia." Raritan (Spring 1987). Quoted as
"Emerson and the Work of Melancholia" in Bloom, Harold, ed. Ralph Waldo Emerson,
Updated Edition, Bloom's Modern Critical Views. New York: Chelsea House Publishing,
2006. Bloom's Literary Reference Online. Facts On File, Inc. 11 Nov 2010.
Analysis on Walden
Thoreau narrates and illustrates his time of partial isolation from society and connection to nature from his work, Walden. He includes many philosophical theories and assertions on life between the relation of nature, man, and spirit. Michaela Keck highlights many of these in her critical essay, mostly through summarizing, but through some analyzing too.
One thing Keck discusses is Thoreau's writing style in Walden. Keck claims that through Thoreau's separation of civilization intellectually, physically, and socially, his connection to nature makes his writing have a sense of exhilaration and abundance, especially in his descriptions (Keck). This is agreeable, because Thoreau appears to be very confident and upfront with his ideas, and strongly advocates nature and its counterparts. He is very detailed with his descriptions, and this makes him seem fairly excited about it. In his scattered opinions, ideas, and theories, Thoreau writes about a battle that takes place between some ants in extreme detail - "...there came along a single red ant on the hillside of this valley, evidently full of excitement, who either had despatched his foe, or had not yet taken part in the battle; probably the latter... whose mother had charged him to return with his shield or upon it" (Thorea 217). The fascination and imagination of Thoreau is definitely portrayed here, and through out the rest of his detailed description. Most people would cast bare minimum attention to a few ants on the ground, but Thoreau actually exerts his full attention to them, imagining their feelings, trying to understand their actions, and comparing them to human battles, which almost seems to personify the ants (Thoreau 218). Not only is Thoreau exerting attention to these ants, but he seems so excited about them, and seems to greatly appreciate nature for this battle, which seems to inspire some great insight about humans in him (Thoreau 217-218). Keck's statement of Thoreau's "intimate, engaged, and sensual relationship with nature" is definitely accurate with passages such as this one, as well as others that are as detailed and analyzed as this one (Keck).
Keck points out and explains some common misinterpretations and criticisms that stem from Thoreau's Walden, such as Thoreau being a "hermit" or his retreat being one of failure and hypocrisy (Keck). Although Thoreau might give off a strong image of a hermit in his writing, Keck points out that he actually stated he "loves society as much as most", and throughout his journey, he kept in touch with family members (Keck). He even directly stated that he "naturally [is] no hermit" (Keck). One criticism that Thoreau's voice is one of a hypocrite, Keck disagrees with this and brings attention to the fact that Thoreau's journey was an experiment and new approach, and was to be treated as a new way to live daily (Keck). I personally disagree with this because Keck contradicts herself in this sentence, or is capturing Thoreau's contradiction. Either way, Thoreau wrote about a temporary journey into a more secluded and simple life, and in his encouragement of this, it seems he expected people to maintain a similar life of simplicity on a more permanent basis. Thoreau really doesn't have any grounds on which to assert this encouragement in such a confident manner unless he were to live this style for the extended time period in which he is suggesting to others. Other than this, I do agree with most of Keck's claims and assertions on Thoreau's collection of philosophical ideas between man, nature, and civilization. He picks many key points of the writing and discusses them interesting observations.
Works Cited
Keck, Michaela. "Thoreau's Walden and the American Dream: Challenge or Myth?" In Bloom,
Harold, ed. The American Dream, Bloom's Literary Themes. New York: Chelsea Publishing
House, 2009. Bloom's Literary Reference Online. Facts On File, Inc. http://www.fofweb.com
/activelink2.asp?ItemID=WE54&SID=5&iPin= BLTTAD021&SingleRecord=True (accessed
November 18, 2010).
Thoreau, Henry David. "Walden". American Literature. Willhelm, Jeffory. McGraw Hill.
Columbus, 2009. Print.
One thing Keck discusses is Thoreau's writing style in Walden. Keck claims that through Thoreau's separation of civilization intellectually, physically, and socially, his connection to nature makes his writing have a sense of exhilaration and abundance, especially in his descriptions (Keck). This is agreeable, because Thoreau appears to be very confident and upfront with his ideas, and strongly advocates nature and its counterparts. He is very detailed with his descriptions, and this makes him seem fairly excited about it. In his scattered opinions, ideas, and theories, Thoreau writes about a battle that takes place between some ants in extreme detail - "...there came along a single red ant on the hillside of this valley, evidently full of excitement, who either had despatched his foe, or had not yet taken part in the battle; probably the latter... whose mother had charged him to return with his shield or upon it" (Thorea 217). The fascination and imagination of Thoreau is definitely portrayed here, and through out the rest of his detailed description. Most people would cast bare minimum attention to a few ants on the ground, but Thoreau actually exerts his full attention to them, imagining their feelings, trying to understand their actions, and comparing them to human battles, which almost seems to personify the ants (Thoreau 218). Not only is Thoreau exerting attention to these ants, but he seems so excited about them, and seems to greatly appreciate nature for this battle, which seems to inspire some great insight about humans in him (Thoreau 217-218). Keck's statement of Thoreau's "intimate, engaged, and sensual relationship with nature" is definitely accurate with passages such as this one, as well as others that are as detailed and analyzed as this one (Keck).
Keck points out and explains some common misinterpretations and criticisms that stem from Thoreau's Walden, such as Thoreau being a "hermit" or his retreat being one of failure and hypocrisy (Keck). Although Thoreau might give off a strong image of a hermit in his writing, Keck points out that he actually stated he "loves society as much as most", and throughout his journey, he kept in touch with family members (Keck). He even directly stated that he "naturally [is] no hermit" (Keck). One criticism that Thoreau's voice is one of a hypocrite, Keck disagrees with this and brings attention to the fact that Thoreau's journey was an experiment and new approach, and was to be treated as a new way to live daily (Keck). I personally disagree with this because Keck contradicts herself in this sentence, or is capturing Thoreau's contradiction. Either way, Thoreau wrote about a temporary journey into a more secluded and simple life, and in his encouragement of this, it seems he expected people to maintain a similar life of simplicity on a more permanent basis. Thoreau really doesn't have any grounds on which to assert this encouragement in such a confident manner unless he were to live this style for the extended time period in which he is suggesting to others. Other than this, I do agree with most of Keck's claims and assertions on Thoreau's collection of philosophical ideas between man, nature, and civilization. He picks many key points of the writing and discusses them interesting observations.
Works Cited
Keck, Michaela. "Thoreau's Walden and the American Dream: Challenge or Myth?" In Bloom,
Harold, ed. The American Dream, Bloom's Literary Themes. New York: Chelsea Publishing
House, 2009. Bloom's Literary Reference Online. Facts On File, Inc. http://www.fofweb.com
/activelink2.asp?ItemID=WE54&SID=5&iPin= BLTTAD021&SingleRecord=True (accessed
November 18, 2010).
Thoreau, Henry David. "Walden". American Literature. Willhelm, Jeffory. McGraw Hill.
Columbus, 2009. Print.
Thursday, November 18, 2010
Contrasting Thoreau and Gandhi
Thoreau was a prominent Romanticist poet. He wrote commendable poems commonly during the 1800's. Romanticism, a much more spiritual and radical writing form, which differed from the former Rationalism period. Rationalism retained a more straight-forward and intellectual source to obtain readers. This common writing style made up much of the prior period to the Romanticism era. Rationalism often used reason to obtain its strong support. Writers such as Franklin commonly used Rationalism to convey their points. Romanticism is a more spiritually based writing period. This period retained much respect during its formation. Although Romanticism contained nature, death, and spiritual connection, it lacked common logic and reason. This was not typically a negative aspect though. Religious influence was also more common in Romanticist pieces then that of a Rationalist piece. Because of this, some religious relations were reconnected again. Thoreau's early work displays this Romanticist style of writing.
Morals were often questioned in Romanticist pieces. Various pieces used this questioning to obtain support. These morally conflicting issues would determine a more definitive differentiation between Romanticism and other writing periods. Gandhi commonly used this to obtain support from his audience. If something was morally conflicting, then it would be socially acceptable to disregard the law that was set forth with no thought on morals. Gandhi displays his objection toward the law in On the Eve of Historic Dandi March: "Wherever possible, civil disobedience of salt laws should be started. These laws can be violated in three ways" (Gandhi). This displays Gandhi's strong disregard toward the law. Because of this statement, many can agree that Gandhi, like Thoreau, commonly used an action like this to display true Romanticism and morally acceptable pieces. Gandhi is well known for his unconventional actions and radical activism. This radical activism can also be related to a more Romanticist style of living. Thoreau and Gandhi both initiated a strong liberal stance.
Gandhi was a more national and strong political figure. He typically had a strong support base. This support base greatly improved his stance and political prominence in India. Although Gandhi used his supporters to his advantage, he would not have been as successful without them. This differs from Thoreau, who had a more independent relationship with his ideals and theories. Thoreau did not obtain the use of a strong support base. Because of this, his actions could be slightly more commendable. In this excerpt from Civil Disobedience, Thoreau displays his independent stance in politics and literature. "I have paid no poll-tax for six years. I was put into a jail once on this account, for one night; and as I stood considering the walls of solid stone, two or three feet thick, the door of wood and iron, a foot thick, and the iron grating which strained the light, I could not help being struck with the foolishness of that institution which treated me as if I were mere flesh and blood and bones, to be locked up" (Thoreau). Although I commend Thoreau for his independent stance, I feel that both figures successfully displayed the conflict regarding morals and values. Again, this conflict displayed the figure's ability to convey Romanticism outside of literature.
Gandhi, Mohandas. "One the Eve of Historic Dandi March." American Literature. Columbus, Ohio: McGraw-Hill Companies, 2009. 229-230. Print.
Thoreau, Henry David. "Civil Disobedience." American Literature. Columbus, Ohio: McGraw-Hill Companies, 2009. 222-227. Print.
Morals were often questioned in Romanticist pieces. Various pieces used this questioning to obtain support. These morally conflicting issues would determine a more definitive differentiation between Romanticism and other writing periods. Gandhi commonly used this to obtain support from his audience. If something was morally conflicting, then it would be socially acceptable to disregard the law that was set forth with no thought on morals. Gandhi displays his objection toward the law in On the Eve of Historic Dandi March: "Wherever possible, civil disobedience of salt laws should be started. These laws can be violated in three ways" (Gandhi). This displays Gandhi's strong disregard toward the law. Because of this statement, many can agree that Gandhi, like Thoreau, commonly used an action like this to display true Romanticism and morally acceptable pieces. Gandhi is well known for his unconventional actions and radical activism. This radical activism can also be related to a more Romanticist style of living. Thoreau and Gandhi both initiated a strong liberal stance.
Gandhi was a more national and strong political figure. He typically had a strong support base. This support base greatly improved his stance and political prominence in India. Although Gandhi used his supporters to his advantage, he would not have been as successful without them. This differs from Thoreau, who had a more independent relationship with his ideals and theories. Thoreau did not obtain the use of a strong support base. Because of this, his actions could be slightly more commendable. In this excerpt from Civil Disobedience, Thoreau displays his independent stance in politics and literature. "I have paid no poll-tax for six years. I was put into a jail once on this account, for one night; and as I stood considering the walls of solid stone, two or three feet thick, the door of wood and iron, a foot thick, and the iron grating which strained the light, I could not help being struck with the foolishness of that institution which treated me as if I were mere flesh and blood and bones, to be locked up" (Thoreau). Although I commend Thoreau for his independent stance, I feel that both figures successfully displayed the conflict regarding morals and values. Again, this conflict displayed the figure's ability to convey Romanticism outside of literature.
Gandhi, Mohandas. "One the Eve of Historic Dandi March." American Literature. Columbus, Ohio: McGraw-Hill Companies, 2009. 229-230. Print.
Thoreau, Henry David. "Civil Disobedience." American Literature. Columbus, Ohio: McGraw-Hill Companies, 2009. 222-227. Print.
Wednesday, November 17, 2010
Journal #23: Unplugging from Technology
Technology is such a huge aspect of today's society. I think that it is quite difficult to just eliminate technology and its influence on the modern era; teenagers especially would be quite effected by this elimination. Even though my life does not completely revolve around technology, I would not really enjoy the elimination of technology. Technology is not just your phone or ipod, its basically everything. I believe it would be quite difficult to go without any technology at all. I could go without an ipod, but maybe not my phone. That sounds quite stereotypical of a teenager, but I just would not feel right without it. I could probably go without other technology though. But I do not really care for camping. I mean its alright and all, but I just do not really care for it all that much. I think it is kind of boring, unless you do something completely awesome. I like the outdoors and all, but I just do not like certain things about camping. Its pretty boring sometimes. Plus I can barely eat anything when I go camping. I cannot even have smores.
If I were to go camping, I would probably go somewhere in another state. I would actually love to go camping somewhere that is geographically appealing. Possibly someplace in the west could be pretty appealing. I have never gone out west so I have no idea what it is like out there. In that case, I believe I would really enjoy camping. To pass the time, I would probably walk around and maybe draw or paint something. I think that would be pretty awesome. I would mostly just explore what is out there and see how cool everything is. I do not think I would be placed in a situation where my survival would be tested, but if so, I would probably just use instinct to survive. I guess I would find just foods that I knew were find and eat them. I really do not know what I would do in that situation. I hope that situation would never occur. I do not know what I would do without a car or something. I do not even know how I would be in a situation where a vehicle was not even present. I guess I cannot really imagine being in a terrible situation in which my survival is on the line.
If I were to go camping, I would probably go somewhere in another state. I would actually love to go camping somewhere that is geographically appealing. Possibly someplace in the west could be pretty appealing. I have never gone out west so I have no idea what it is like out there. In that case, I believe I would really enjoy camping. To pass the time, I would probably walk around and maybe draw or paint something. I think that would be pretty awesome. I would mostly just explore what is out there and see how cool everything is. I do not think I would be placed in a situation where my survival would be tested, but if so, I would probably just use instinct to survive. I guess I would find just foods that I knew were find and eat them. I really do not know what I would do in that situation. I hope that situation would never occur. I do not know what I would do without a car or something. I do not even know how I would be in a situation where a vehicle was not even present. I guess I cannot really imagine being in a terrible situation in which my survival is on the line.
Thursday, November 11, 2010
Journal #22: Disregarding the Law
There are many predicaments when morals and laws are questioned. Often, laws are not connected to the moral fabric of society. Issues such a gay marriage and homeless citizens can be questioned with morals and what is believed to be right and wrong. Without morals in society, various actions and ideals can be greatly altered. I believe some laws may be disregarded if it is morally questioning.
I am a strong supporters of Humanism, and I feel that every human being is created equal. Equality is a subject that is often misinterpreted, especially when related to religion. I feel that religion is a perfect example of what is morally acceptable and what is not. I have no problem with people's ideals and actions, especially when related to religion. I believe that religion conveys an often misinterpreted vision of equality and Humanism, though. Gay marriage is an issue that has been contested throughout history. I feel that everyone should have the right to wed, regardless of faith, sexual orientation, or ethnicity. I support equal marriage because I feel that is a completely equal opportunity in society. I believe that one's love cannot be denied due to something so minor as one's sexual orientation. I believe the law should be disregarded in this sense. Everyone should have an equal opportunity to live the way they want to. I do not believe one should determine how another one should live his or her life. This is a subject that I am pretty opinionated on. Although I am opinionated when relating the law and gay marriage, I will listen to both sides. I will listen to the religious side and I will not contest it. I believe everyone has a valid point and I am not going to stifle one with my ideals.
Everyone has morals and I believe everyone should act on what they feel is right. If it involves harm in another human being either verbally, mentally, or physically, I feel that the law should be disregarded. I completely agree with disregarding the law if it is harmful or morally conflicting.
I am a strong supporters of Humanism, and I feel that every human being is created equal. Equality is a subject that is often misinterpreted, especially when related to religion. I feel that religion is a perfect example of what is morally acceptable and what is not. I have no problem with people's ideals and actions, especially when related to religion. I believe that religion conveys an often misinterpreted vision of equality and Humanism, though. Gay marriage is an issue that has been contested throughout history. I feel that everyone should have the right to wed, regardless of faith, sexual orientation, or ethnicity. I support equal marriage because I feel that is a completely equal opportunity in society. I believe that one's love cannot be denied due to something so minor as one's sexual orientation. I believe the law should be disregarded in this sense. Everyone should have an equal opportunity to live the way they want to. I do not believe one should determine how another one should live his or her life. This is a subject that I am pretty opinionated on. Although I am opinionated when relating the law and gay marriage, I will listen to both sides. I will listen to the religious side and I will not contest it. I believe everyone has a valid point and I am not going to stifle one with my ideals.
Everyone has morals and I believe everyone should act on what they feel is right. If it involves harm in another human being either verbally, mentally, or physically, I feel that the law should be disregarded. I completely agree with disregarding the law if it is harmful or morally conflicting.
Wednesday, November 3, 2010
Journal #19: The Ideal United States
I am a bit of a sucker for Obama. I believe he is doing quite well for his situation. Too much was expected of Obama and I believe his minor policies, which I mostly agree with, will better the future, even though he is taking small steps. Many people oppose the idea of Socialism and Obama's relation with it. I believe Socialism is an extremely commendable theory and should be a little more embraced than what it is. If executed properly, Socialism could be an outstanding solution to an ongoing problem. The only opposition to the theory would be its connection with Communism. Communism, an often poorly executed theory, is under the large Socialist umbrella. This political umbrella entails the deterioration of Capitalism and inequality in the economy. Many oppose this idea because social classes and differentiation in wages will be eliminated. I believe Socialism is a great theory that can be the lasting resolution to the problem our economy and government is facing. The theory is quite scary to some because many believe it entails a dictatorship. Socialism, which is intended to drive itself out of business (similar to the elimination of large corporations in this theory), does not entail a dictatorship. The idea of the theory is to reach a Utopian point where government is not needed. This is something that seems unobtainable though. I believe this mentality will disable any plans of converting to Socialism, which somewhat upsets me. We, as humans and Americans, should be treated equal. Differentiation in economy and mannerisms rule our social independence. Although Some feel that I omit a Communist approach to life, I do not believe it is a bad thing. I have strong opinions about our political future. A conservative and secure approach has obviously not worked ,therefore, the United States needs a more radical and better executed approach to the economy and government. When dubbed with the title "Communist" or "Socialist," I simply agree and continue to believe that a more radical response to the outstanding problems in our country will eventually better the United States.
Thursday, October 28, 2010
John Greenleaf Whittier Analysis
For our poem, we chose John Greenleaf Whittier's My Playmate. The poem reflects a blossoming time in which the narrator is playing with a companion his age. The first stanza depicts the atmosphere. The atmosphere seems a bit lively and springlike. Whittier describes the various objects outside, such as birds, flowers, music, and blooming. This is an effective use of imagery used to captivate his audience.
Also in the first stanza, Whittier describes the the blossoms as falling like snow. This is a successful use of description. The narrator continues to describe the day with the companion. Use of imagery is effectively displayed in the poem. I believe Whittier used this imagery to further display the narrator's infatuation with the companion.
Throughout the poem, Whittier continuously uses balanced imagery and description throughout. My Playmate is an effective display of friendship and the relation of nature with the poem's characters. This is a typical aspect of fireside poetry and the use of Romanticism in a literary piece. Although I feel that Whittier's piece is slightly repetitive, I believe he effectively obtained the respect and entertainment of readers who enjoy the poem's point.
Also in the first stanza, Whittier describes the the blossoms as falling like snow. This is a successful use of description. The narrator continues to describe the day with the companion. Use of imagery is effectively displayed in the poem. I believe Whittier used this imagery to further display the narrator's infatuation with the companion.
Throughout the poem, Whittier continuously uses balanced imagery and description throughout. My Playmate is an effective display of friendship and the relation of nature with the poem's characters. This is a typical aspect of fireside poetry and the use of Romanticism in a literary piece. Although I feel that Whittier's piece is slightly repetitive, I believe he effectively obtained the respect and entertainment of readers who enjoy the poem's point.
Wednesday, October 27, 2010
Longfellow Analysis
The poem I decided to analyze was Henry Wadsworth Longfellow's The Arrow and the Song. Although the poem was short and simple, it displayed the embarking style of Romanticism in poetry. Longfellow's various poems only agree with basic Romanticist ideas in this time period. Nature, death, and companionship are typical topics found in these poems. Longfellow effectively displays the Romanticist period in literature.
The Arrow and the Song is a successful attempt at a creative piece. The piece displays standard topics and language that would be typically found in a Romanticist literary work. Longfellow depicts friendship or companionship. This can be a common subject in most literary pieces. I believe Longfellow's relation with a sustaining arrow is quite effective. Although I believe the arrow is an effective aspect of the poem, I believe the poem's length and lack of elaboration confuses some readers. Because of this, I believe the piece lacks some definitive identity. When comparing the specific poem to others in this period, the piece seems to lack originality and overall success. I believe an increase in length and description could obtain a more satisfactory response.
I also noticed that the piece was almost rushed and a bit redundant. Regardless of its length, a poem may have sufficient meaning and satisfaction. I feel that The Arrow and the Song was somewhat unsuccessful in its goal. Although I believe the poem contained various literary aspects that displayed Romanticism, the overall goal was not met. The piece reflects companionship through song and an arrow. I believe the arrow is a good aspect of the poem, and I also enjoyed the deep wording of the piece. I believe Longfellow captured the readers with his melodic structure. Although I believe some usage was effective, the piece could have been executed slightly better. Nevertheless, the poem reflects the Romanticist period in which Longfellow inhabited.
The Arrow and the Song is a successful attempt at a creative piece. The piece displays standard topics and language that would be typically found in a Romanticist literary work. Longfellow depicts friendship or companionship. This can be a common subject in most literary pieces. I believe Longfellow's relation with a sustaining arrow is quite effective. Although I believe the arrow is an effective aspect of the poem, I believe the poem's length and lack of elaboration confuses some readers. Because of this, I believe the piece lacks some definitive identity. When comparing the specific poem to others in this period, the piece seems to lack originality and overall success. I believe an increase in length and description could obtain a more satisfactory response.
I also noticed that the piece was almost rushed and a bit redundant. Regardless of its length, a poem may have sufficient meaning and satisfaction. I feel that The Arrow and the Song was somewhat unsuccessful in its goal. Although I believe the poem contained various literary aspects that displayed Romanticism, the overall goal was not met. The piece reflects companionship through song and an arrow. I believe the arrow is a good aspect of the poem, and I also enjoyed the deep wording of the piece. I believe Longfellow captured the readers with his melodic structure. Although I believe some usage was effective, the piece could have been executed slightly better. Nevertheless, the poem reflects the Romanticist period in which Longfellow inhabited.
Friday, October 22, 2010
Journal #17: Bonding with Nature
I do not really know what this post should entail. I really do not know of a time where I "bonded" with nature. It is honestly kind of odd. I guess it is referring to a time when I connected with nature or something. I believe everyone has connected with nature at one point. A connection could be anything. Whether someone is just sitting outside reflecting upon life, or if someone just did something to help the environment.
I believe it is very important to imporve our environment in today's society. A lot of people in the modern world are enjoying all the eco-friendly alternatives that we have. When someone plants a tree or picks up trash, they are improving our environment. Even though these things are so minor, one is slowly improving nature and the world in which we inhabit. This is quite appropriate and significant for our time period. I really commend the people who go out of their way to improve our world. It is a really wonderful thing that we have some people who will do this.
I like to go outside and kind of reflect. I like nature and the authentic feeling of the air and the outdoors. It really helps sooth someone and I typically take advantage of this mellow feeling that the outdoors contains. I typically go on multiple walks. This allows me to reflect, yet again, and spend sometime outdoors. I also get great inspiration from nature and my surroundings. This greatly sooths me and allows me to chill out and escape the stress for a little bit of time.
Although I like nature, I only enjoy it to a certain point. I strongly dislike camping because it is pretty gross and often boring. I also dislike the surroundings and the feeling that comes out of camping. It is super uncomfortable and I really dislike it. Although I enjoy reflecting through nature, I am not a big fan of camping and extended stays outdoors.
I believe it is very important to imporve our environment in today's society. A lot of people in the modern world are enjoying all the eco-friendly alternatives that we have. When someone plants a tree or picks up trash, they are improving our environment. Even though these things are so minor, one is slowly improving nature and the world in which we inhabit. This is quite appropriate and significant for our time period. I really commend the people who go out of their way to improve our world. It is a really wonderful thing that we have some people who will do this.
I like to go outside and kind of reflect. I like nature and the authentic feeling of the air and the outdoors. It really helps sooth someone and I typically take advantage of this mellow feeling that the outdoors contains. I typically go on multiple walks. This allows me to reflect, yet again, and spend sometime outdoors. I also get great inspiration from nature and my surroundings. This greatly sooths me and allows me to chill out and escape the stress for a little bit of time.
Although I like nature, I only enjoy it to a certain point. I strongly dislike camping because it is pretty gross and often boring. I also dislike the surroundings and the feeling that comes out of camping. It is super uncomfortable and I really dislike it. Although I enjoy reflecting through nature, I am not a big fan of camping and extended stays outdoors.
Wednesday, October 20, 2010
Journal #16: My Favorite Cars
So I absolutely love cars and I enjoy the fact that I get to talk about cars in a three hundred twenty five word blog. It is pretty sweet and I quite enjoy this. I watch various shows and read about all the awesome cars being sold and driven today. I absolutely HATE American cars. I think they are atrocious and terribly built. General Motors is the worst company in the world. I cannot stand their cars. I can tolerate Ford because they are not boring, ugly, unreliable, and they do not destroy foreign car companies after they buy out a brand. Saab was almost completely destroyed by General Motors.
I love manual vehicles. I will never again drive an automatic and therefore, it shows that I enjoy coupes and sports cars. I really like Honda, Volkswagon, Toyota, Audi, etc. Currently, I drive a Toyota Celica. For its age and reduction in horsepower, it is still quite fast. It is a 5-speed, of course, and it is pretty awesome. Although it is cool, I do not think I want to keep it for too much longer. I would really enjoy a 2006-2010 Honda Civic SI. The car is pretty fast, plus they are 6-speeds. Although I really enjoy the car, I do not think I can find a more affordable one. Therefore, I would enjoy a Scion tC, or a Volkswagon GTI. They are both really cool cars but the tC is not that fast. The GTI is much faster than the tC. This is something I kind of want in a car. I do not want to street race it or anything, I just want a car that has good acceleration. But my dream car, which is completely impossible to obtain, is an Audi R8. Those cars are unbelievably fast and attractive. This car would be the ideal choice if I were a millionaire. So those are some of my favorite cars. Obviously because I enjoy cars I have a lot more favorites, but these are just a few.
I love manual vehicles. I will never again drive an automatic and therefore, it shows that I enjoy coupes and sports cars. I really like Honda, Volkswagon, Toyota, Audi, etc. Currently, I drive a Toyota Celica. For its age and reduction in horsepower, it is still quite fast. It is a 5-speed, of course, and it is pretty awesome. Although it is cool, I do not think I want to keep it for too much longer. I would really enjoy a 2006-2010 Honda Civic SI. The car is pretty fast, plus they are 6-speeds. Although I really enjoy the car, I do not think I can find a more affordable one. Therefore, I would enjoy a Scion tC, or a Volkswagon GTI. They are both really cool cars but the tC is not that fast. The GTI is much faster than the tC. This is something I kind of want in a car. I do not want to street race it or anything, I just want a car that has good acceleration. But my dream car, which is completely impossible to obtain, is an Audi R8. Those cars are unbelievably fast and attractive. This car would be the ideal choice if I were a millionaire. So those are some of my favorite cars. Obviously because I enjoy cars I have a lot more favorites, but these are just a few.
Tuesday, October 19, 2010
Journal 15: Logic and Reason
I use logic and reason all the time. I am someone who likes to think a decision or action through. It took me about six months to prepare myself for the conversion to Vegetarianism. It was something I had to intently think about and use a large amount of logic and reason. I had to prepare myself physically and mentally. I had to get used to a new routine and diet and I could not just stop eating meat all of the sudden. With the preparation of this diet, I slowly stopped eating meat and eventually cut out every source of meat. By doing this in moderation, I prevented any sickness to myself. Vitamins and natural resources were used to obtain this new diet. Although I believe vitamins were necessary in the beginning, I have since discovered that natural vitamins are much healthier.
Driving is another subject you would use logic and reason. A driver has to be completely aware and logical. Any erratic actions or illogical choices could cost someone's life. I think it is very important to use reason and logic to judge a vehicles speed or proximity. This could help and many accidents could be avoided if the driver were to use an intelligent decision when driving. I believe many young adolescents forget to use their head when driving and making decisions. This is extremely unsafe and displays our development due to age. I believe adolescents do not have the greatest ability to use logic and reason. This is quite unfortunate but pretty common. We think in hypothetical situations but we do not use that much reason to act on these hypothetical processes.
Adolescents are not the only ones who do not use logic and reason all that much. Many adults do this as well but I spoke about adolescent instances due to my age. I believe it is much more significant when speaking about adolescents as well. I do not think that adults are typically as illogical and unreasonable then adolescents. Yes I am sometimes very illogical and naive, but I do like to use some reason. I think in hypothetical situations and my mind often wanders to the more positive aspects of life. This is a common characteristic of someone my age. I believe we are all guilty of not using reason sometimes.
Driving is another subject you would use logic and reason. A driver has to be completely aware and logical. Any erratic actions or illogical choices could cost someone's life. I think it is very important to use reason and logic to judge a vehicles speed or proximity. This could help and many accidents could be avoided if the driver were to use an intelligent decision when driving. I believe many young adolescents forget to use their head when driving and making decisions. This is extremely unsafe and displays our development due to age. I believe adolescents do not have the greatest ability to use logic and reason. This is quite unfortunate but pretty common. We think in hypothetical situations but we do not use that much reason to act on these hypothetical processes.
Adolescents are not the only ones who do not use logic and reason all that much. Many adults do this as well but I spoke about adolescent instances due to my age. I believe it is much more significant when speaking about adolescents as well. I do not think that adults are typically as illogical and unreasonable then adolescents. Yes I am sometimes very illogical and naive, but I do like to use some reason. I think in hypothetical situations and my mind often wanders to the more positive aspects of life. This is a common characteristic of someone my age. I believe we are all guilty of not using reason sometimes.
Monday, October 18, 2010
Common Sense Reflection
In Thomas Paine's Common Sense piece, he speaks about society and government. His words depict the alteration of government and society. This piece is strong and informative. Paine describes government as being "... but a necessary evil [in best state] in its worst state an intolerable one" (Paine). This conveys many American's thought process on government and its prominence in society. Government is described by Paine as being "intolerable." This statement is strong for its time of publication. Government was greatly adapting and this statement only reflects many citizens objections toward Monarchy and society. The piece allowed audiences to maintain the belief that war against Britain was possible.
Many people's objections toward Monarchy and the king are depicted through Paine's piece. Paine believed that government was not tolerable and the Monarchy divided various bystanders into social classes. In the following quote, Paine describes his discontent with the Monarchy:
"Some writers have explained the English constitution thus; the king, say they, is one, the people another; the peers are an house in behalf of the king; the commons in behalf of the people; but this hath all the distinctions of an house divided against itself; and though the expressions be pleasantly arranged, yet when examined they appear idle and ambiguous; and it will always happen, that the nicest construction that words are capable of, when applied to the description of something which either cannot exist, or is too incomprehensible to be within the compass of description, will be words of sound only, and though they may amuse the ear, they cannot inform the mind, for this explanation includes a previous question, viz. How came the king by a power which the people are afraid to trust, and always obliged to check? Such a power could not be the gift of a wise people, neither can any power, which needs checking, be from God; yet the provision, which the constitution makes, supposes such a power to exist." (Paine)
"But the provision is unequal to the task; the means either cannot or will not accomplish the end, and the whole affair is a felo de se; for as the greater weight will always carry up the less, and as all the wheels of a machine are put in motion by one, it only remains to know which power in the constitution has the most weight, for that will govern; and though the others, or a part of them, may clog, or, as the phrase is, check the rapidity of its motion, yet so long as they cannot stop it, their endeavors will be ineffectual; the first moving power will at last have its way, and what it wants in speed is supplied by time." (Paine)
"That the crown is this overbearing part in the English constitution needs not be mentioned, and that it derives its whole consequence merely from being the giver of places pensions is self evident, wherefore, though we have and wise enough to shut and lock a door against absolute monarchy, we at the same time have been foolish enough to put the crown in possession of the key." (Paine)
This statement conveys the objection toward the Monarchy and the social classes. Paine believes social classes did not effectively govern society and that the United States should withdraw from such style. Paine also believes the crown was "overbearing." The piece speaks about the crown's absolute control over the bystanders. This control is ineffective and intolerable. Paine speaks about his strong discontent with an Absolute Monarchy. He believes such control should not reside in one mans hands. This response is quite significant, especially in todays society. The significance of this piece allows many to understand the unhappiness and objections toward the Monarchy and its complete control over thousands.
I completely agree with Paine's piece. I feel that his work displays the objections that many had toward the crown and Monarchy in general. This piece will also display the repercussions of acting in an absolutely controlled environment.
Paine, Thomas. "Common Sense." Common Sense, Philadelphia (1791). W. and T. Bradford. Archiving Early America, 2010. Online. 18October, 2010.
Many people's objections toward Monarchy and the king are depicted through Paine's piece. Paine believed that government was not tolerable and the Monarchy divided various bystanders into social classes. In the following quote, Paine describes his discontent with the Monarchy:
"Some writers have explained the English constitution thus; the king, say they, is one, the people another; the peers are an house in behalf of the king; the commons in behalf of the people; but this hath all the distinctions of an house divided against itself; and though the expressions be pleasantly arranged, yet when examined they appear idle and ambiguous; and it will always happen, that the nicest construction that words are capable of, when applied to the description of something which either cannot exist, or is too incomprehensible to be within the compass of description, will be words of sound only, and though they may amuse the ear, they cannot inform the mind, for this explanation includes a previous question, viz. How came the king by a power which the people are afraid to trust, and always obliged to check? Such a power could not be the gift of a wise people, neither can any power, which needs checking, be from God; yet the provision, which the constitution makes, supposes such a power to exist." (Paine)
"But the provision is unequal to the task; the means either cannot or will not accomplish the end, and the whole affair is a felo de se; for as the greater weight will always carry up the less, and as all the wheels of a machine are put in motion by one, it only remains to know which power in the constitution has the most weight, for that will govern; and though the others, or a part of them, may clog, or, as the phrase is, check the rapidity of its motion, yet so long as they cannot stop it, their endeavors will be ineffectual; the first moving power will at last have its way, and what it wants in speed is supplied by time." (Paine)
"That the crown is this overbearing part in the English constitution needs not be mentioned, and that it derives its whole consequence merely from being the giver of places pensions is self evident, wherefore, though we have and wise enough to shut and lock a door against absolute monarchy, we at the same time have been foolish enough to put the crown in possession of the key." (Paine)
This statement conveys the objection toward the Monarchy and the social classes. Paine believes social classes did not effectively govern society and that the United States should withdraw from such style. Paine also believes the crown was "overbearing." The piece speaks about the crown's absolute control over the bystanders. This control is ineffective and intolerable. Paine speaks about his strong discontent with an Absolute Monarchy. He believes such control should not reside in one mans hands. This response is quite significant, especially in todays society. The significance of this piece allows many to understand the unhappiness and objections toward the Monarchy and its complete control over thousands.
I completely agree with Paine's piece. I feel that his work displays the objections that many had toward the crown and Monarchy in general. This piece will also display the repercussions of acting in an absolutely controlled environment.
Paine, Thomas. "Common Sense." Common Sense, Philadelphia (1791). W. and T. Bradford. Archiving Early America, 2010. Online. 18October, 2010.
Thursday, October 14, 2010
Literary Criticism Reflection
The Autobiography of Benjamin Franklin reflects an altering time period. This alteration did not only take place in government, it also altered the literary community and the economy. This change strongly conveys Rationalism and the disassociation from the mother country. Franklin wrote his autobiography in a narrative, yet entertaining style. Contemporary ideals and langauge were depicted throughout the prominent piece. J.A. Leo Lemay, author of Franklin's Autobiography and the American Dream, stated that Franklin was "incomparably the greatest letter writer." This statement strongly reflects common opinions toward the remarkable author. Franklin, being a prominent figure in the development of the United States, used literature to persuade his audience. His thirteen virtues remain significant in the contemporary society. Remarks are often made in regards to the set of virtues.
Lemay describes The Autobiography of Benjamin Franklin as one of the single most influential novels of all time. This statement is quite strong when comparing to a vast array of literary pieces. Franklins prominence is quite significant, but I believe this particular piece can be somewhat overrated. Lemay believes the piece offers "definitive formulation of the American Dream." The American Dream, as simply described by Lemay, is the rise from rags to riches. Franklin's pieces simply conveys this rise. Franklin was quite popular in early America. He often wrote about American subjects. These subjects often entailed economics, government, and social aspects of society. I believe Franklin's popularity was partly due to Rationalism. With the rise of Rationalist pieces, many Americans discovered a new form of literature and thinking. This new form allowed many Americans to embrace the developing country. Franklin, being a worthy author, used his literary pieces to persuade new ideals onto Americans. With his undoubtedly altering inventions, Franklin displayed his strong passion toward the developing society.
I do not entirely agree with Lemay's critique. Although Franklin was quite significant, I do not believe his work should be so romanticized. Franklin used a more contemporary writing style, but I believe his work was a bit overrated. Rationalism was not completely displayed through Benjamin Franklin. Various authors used this new style of writing in response to the altering society. Lemay uses to much positivity in his critique. I believe Franklin's work should be commended, but to say outright say that Franklin is "incomparably the greatest letter writer" is quite incomprehensible. I believe much more writers should fall into this narrow category. Franklin was a respectable, yet inspiring writer, but I do not agree with Lemay's statement. The response is too biased and direct. Lemay could have possibly described Franklin as a magnificent and influential writer. A statement similar to that would be more respectable and appropriate in comparison to the broad literary community. Franklin was an inspiration American writer, but his topics mainly entailed the birth and development of the United States. His pieces could also get a bit redundant after sometime. This redundancy is due to Franklin's narrow and biased pieces.
In retrospect, I believe Franklin was a very commendable author and inventor, but I believe Lemay's critique is too narrow and divided. There could be much more to say about other influential authors in this time period. My response toward the critique is strong. I believe Lemay could have executed it much better.
Lemay, J.A. Leo. "Franklin's Autobiography and the American Dream." InThe Renaissance Man in the Eighteenth Century. Los Angeles: William Andrews Clark Memorial Library, 1978. Quoted as "Franklin's Autobiography and the American Dream." in Bloom, Harold, ed. The American Dream, Bloom's Literary Themes. New York: Chelsea Publishing House, 2009. Bloom's Literary Reference Online. Facts On File, Inc. http://www.fofweb.com/activelink2.asp?ItemID=WE54&SID=5&iPin= BLTTAD005&SingleRecord=True (accessed October 16, 2010).
Lemay describes The Autobiography of Benjamin Franklin as one of the single most influential novels of all time. This statement is quite strong when comparing to a vast array of literary pieces. Franklins prominence is quite significant, but I believe this particular piece can be somewhat overrated. Lemay believes the piece offers "definitive formulation of the American Dream." The American Dream, as simply described by Lemay, is the rise from rags to riches. Franklin's pieces simply conveys this rise. Franklin was quite popular in early America. He often wrote about American subjects. These subjects often entailed economics, government, and social aspects of society. I believe Franklin's popularity was partly due to Rationalism. With the rise of Rationalist pieces, many Americans discovered a new form of literature and thinking. This new form allowed many Americans to embrace the developing country. Franklin, being a worthy author, used his literary pieces to persuade new ideals onto Americans. With his undoubtedly altering inventions, Franklin displayed his strong passion toward the developing society.
I do not entirely agree with Lemay's critique. Although Franklin was quite significant, I do not believe his work should be so romanticized. Franklin used a more contemporary writing style, but I believe his work was a bit overrated. Rationalism was not completely displayed through Benjamin Franklin. Various authors used this new style of writing in response to the altering society. Lemay uses to much positivity in his critique. I believe Franklin's work should be commended, but to say outright say that Franklin is "incomparably the greatest letter writer" is quite incomprehensible. I believe much more writers should fall into this narrow category. Franklin was a respectable, yet inspiring writer, but I do not agree with Lemay's statement. The response is too biased and direct. Lemay could have possibly described Franklin as a magnificent and influential writer. A statement similar to that would be more respectable and appropriate in comparison to the broad literary community. Franklin was an inspiration American writer, but his topics mainly entailed the birth and development of the United States. His pieces could also get a bit redundant after sometime. This redundancy is due to Franklin's narrow and biased pieces.
In retrospect, I believe Franklin was a very commendable author and inventor, but I believe Lemay's critique is too narrow and divided. There could be much more to say about other influential authors in this time period. My response toward the critique is strong. I believe Lemay could have executed it much better.
Lemay, J.A. Leo. "Franklin's Autobiography and the American Dream." InThe Renaissance Man in the Eighteenth Century. Los Angeles: William Andrews Clark Memorial Library, 1978. Quoted as "Franklin's Autobiography and the American Dream." in Bloom, Harold, ed. The American Dream, Bloom's Literary Themes. New York: Chelsea Publishing House, 2009. Bloom's Literary Reference Online. Facts On File, Inc. http://www.fofweb.com/activelink2.asp?ItemID=WE54&SID=5&iPin= BLTTAD005&SingleRecord=True (accessed October 16, 2010).
Tuesday, October 12, 2010
Journal #14: Declaration of Vegetarianism
My perception of animal rights is quite strong. For the last three years, I have been an active participant in Peta2. By participating in this organization, I have been able to observe and persuade my opinion toward vegetarianism. After discovering the harms of chicken three years ago, I began to cut it out. In steps I started to cut out various meat products until full vegetarianism was obtained.
Throughout the two and a half years I have been a vegetarian, I have gone through criticism and definitive opinions. I, unlike other vegetarians, respect everyone's decision and opinions toward the diet choice. I do not persecute people for not partaking in a vegetarian diet, nor do I believe everyone should stop eating meat. If treated correctly, I believe the meat industry would be respectable. If animals were not abused and injected with harmful hormones, I would be content with the industry. By collapsing the meat industry, America's economy would deteriorate. This deterioration would not be acceptable, nor would I condone this.
Throughout the three years I have been a vegetarian, I have met various people and groups who all have their own reasons for the diet. Health reasons are quite common. Meat, being the hardest food to digest, is full of harmful hormones which are placed in animals to allow them to grow much faster. These hormones are so toxic that the majority of animals injected with them cannot even walk to the slaughterhouse. The animals have to be pushed off a truck where they are whipped and beaten for not walking. This brings another issue up. Animal rights, which is my main reason for the diet, is very important. Most animals are brutally tortured for not abiding their farmers. Snapping necks, whips, guns, and hormones are wrongfully used on the animals. Most mothers are completely separated from their young. They cry out and a beaten for making any abnormal noises. This is the main problem in the meat industry. I have also hear of another less common reason for the diet-Science. Science depicts evolution and the adaptations of humans throughout time. Humans are herbivores. This is a fact many people are unaware of. Our characteristics vary depending on one's diet. Although humans have the ability to eat meat, digestion is really hard. Humans have a large digestive system which lacks an acid that can easily digest meat. Carnivores can only move their mouths up and down, whereas herbivores may move their mouths up, down, left, and right. Herbivores have only two incisors for some chewing whereas carnivores have all incisors. Whether its science, animal rights, or health issues, all vegetarians have acceptable reasons for choosing that diet. Even if one does not choose a vegetarian diet, I completely respect their decision and will not be offended by it whatsoever.
Throughout the two and a half years I have been a vegetarian, I have gone through criticism and definitive opinions. I, unlike other vegetarians, respect everyone's decision and opinions toward the diet choice. I do not persecute people for not partaking in a vegetarian diet, nor do I believe everyone should stop eating meat. If treated correctly, I believe the meat industry would be respectable. If animals were not abused and injected with harmful hormones, I would be content with the industry. By collapsing the meat industry, America's economy would deteriorate. This deterioration would not be acceptable, nor would I condone this.
Throughout the three years I have been a vegetarian, I have met various people and groups who all have their own reasons for the diet. Health reasons are quite common. Meat, being the hardest food to digest, is full of harmful hormones which are placed in animals to allow them to grow much faster. These hormones are so toxic that the majority of animals injected with them cannot even walk to the slaughterhouse. The animals have to be pushed off a truck where they are whipped and beaten for not walking. This brings another issue up. Animal rights, which is my main reason for the diet, is very important. Most animals are brutally tortured for not abiding their farmers. Snapping necks, whips, guns, and hormones are wrongfully used on the animals. Most mothers are completely separated from their young. They cry out and a beaten for making any abnormal noises. This is the main problem in the meat industry. I have also hear of another less common reason for the diet-Science. Science depicts evolution and the adaptations of humans throughout time. Humans are herbivores. This is a fact many people are unaware of. Our characteristics vary depending on one's diet. Although humans have the ability to eat meat, digestion is really hard. Humans have a large digestive system which lacks an acid that can easily digest meat. Carnivores can only move their mouths up and down, whereas herbivores may move their mouths up, down, left, and right. Herbivores have only two incisors for some chewing whereas carnivores have all incisors. Whether its science, animal rights, or health issues, all vegetarians have acceptable reasons for choosing that diet. Even if one does not choose a vegetarian diet, I completely respect their decision and will not be offended by it whatsoever.
Thursday, October 7, 2010
Journal #13: School Spirit
I have to pretty much rewrite this entire blog because it did not save correctly. Therefore, I am probably going to forget a lot of what I had originally typed. This is quite annoying.
I think school spirit is amusing. Everyone lets loose and run around in support of their school. This is interesting and quite entertaining. By running around on Homecoming, it displays our school's support and ability to have fun. Homecoming activities are quite interesting. The different days that people dress up and wear odd school inspired things makes the day intriguing. I really enjoy the pep rally that is held on the day of the Homecoming game. The assembly displays everyone's strong school spirit. Everyone is completely energetic and enthused about the upcoming events. It is quite entertaining to watch everyone act like they are little kids. Usually something goes wrong though and their is slight chaos for sometime. I like the assembly, but I believe it needs some alterations. Last year the faculty lip sync was pretty different but this year there was not that much different. Mrs. Jenkins did a dance with her fitness classes, but I think it was a little bit too long. It was pretty good but I think it could have been shortened up a bit. I am glad the students got to do the lip sync this year. It was very interesting to see our classmates lip sync to a popular song. The Junior class definitely won that contest. I really do not know what to talk about now because I am just trying to remember what I put. I think everyone is really entertaining when they dress up and participate in Homecoming Week. It is pretty interesting and most people and staff are in a great mood. I do wish the assembly was not so censored. There are way too many rules when it comes to the assembly. I understand some safety issues but I do not think some of the banned actions are too hazardous. So I do enjoy school spirit and everyone's attitude but I think we need to change some stuff up a bit.
I think school spirit is amusing. Everyone lets loose and run around in support of their school. This is interesting and quite entertaining. By running around on Homecoming, it displays our school's support and ability to have fun. Homecoming activities are quite interesting. The different days that people dress up and wear odd school inspired things makes the day intriguing. I really enjoy the pep rally that is held on the day of the Homecoming game. The assembly displays everyone's strong school spirit. Everyone is completely energetic and enthused about the upcoming events. It is quite entertaining to watch everyone act like they are little kids. Usually something goes wrong though and their is slight chaos for sometime. I like the assembly, but I believe it needs some alterations. Last year the faculty lip sync was pretty different but this year there was not that much different. Mrs. Jenkins did a dance with her fitness classes, but I think it was a little bit too long. It was pretty good but I think it could have been shortened up a bit. I am glad the students got to do the lip sync this year. It was very interesting to see our classmates lip sync to a popular song. The Junior class definitely won that contest. I really do not know what to talk about now because I am just trying to remember what I put. I think everyone is really entertaining when they dress up and participate in Homecoming Week. It is pretty interesting and most people and staff are in a great mood. I do wish the assembly was not so censored. There are way too many rules when it comes to the assembly. I understand some safety issues but I do not think some of the banned actions are too hazardous. So I do enjoy school spirit and everyone's attitude but I think we need to change some stuff up a bit.
Journal #12: Working with a Partner
Depending on my mood, I am indifferent towards partner work. I enjoy the company and being able to relay my answers past another person, but sometimes I cannot really concentrate on my work. Im not too opposed to that idea though.
I like working with partners on certain projects. On others though, I do not really care for partner work. I like partner work in certain classes where the information is easy and not as extensive. This makes the assignment a little more enjoyable, plus when finished you can kind of talk with your partner. I enjoy this because it gives a little bit of a break in the class. Some classes I enjoy to work alone though. I like to work alone in classes where the assignment is difficult and quite extensive. It is very hard to complete a difficult assignment, typically due at the end of the class, when you are talking with a partner. I get better answers and better grades on the work without a partner. Although I do not like working with a partner on a difficult worksheet, I enjoy working with a partner on a large project. Projects are much easier to do when two or multiple people can work on it together. The work can be split so everyone is equally working on the project. I quite enjoy this because it is amusing and much easier to complete. Most people like partner work on most of the assignments in school, and I must agree with that. I like working with partners but only on certain assignments, like I stated earlier.
I do not have a lot more to say about partner work. A lot of the time, one will get in trouble for talking or not doing his or her work. This is really common and I am pretty much guilty of this as well. I believe it is sometimes disastrous to place high school students in a group together, usually on a ten or twenty point assignment. Most kids will not take the assignment seriously and will most like complain. This is just typical behavior of adolescents and I cannot argue this whatsoever. I am not opposed to the idea of partner work, but I am not completely for it. I think it would have to be done in the appropriate situation and time. It is typically not the best idea to place high school students in one group together, but I am completely cool with it.
I like working with partners on certain projects. On others though, I do not really care for partner work. I like partner work in certain classes where the information is easy and not as extensive. This makes the assignment a little more enjoyable, plus when finished you can kind of talk with your partner. I enjoy this because it gives a little bit of a break in the class. Some classes I enjoy to work alone though. I like to work alone in classes where the assignment is difficult and quite extensive. It is very hard to complete a difficult assignment, typically due at the end of the class, when you are talking with a partner. I get better answers and better grades on the work without a partner. Although I do not like working with a partner on a difficult worksheet, I enjoy working with a partner on a large project. Projects are much easier to do when two or multiple people can work on it together. The work can be split so everyone is equally working on the project. I quite enjoy this because it is amusing and much easier to complete. Most people like partner work on most of the assignments in school, and I must agree with that. I like working with partners but only on certain assignments, like I stated earlier.
I do not have a lot more to say about partner work. A lot of the time, one will get in trouble for talking or not doing his or her work. This is really common and I am pretty much guilty of this as well. I believe it is sometimes disastrous to place high school students in a group together, usually on a ten or twenty point assignment. Most kids will not take the assignment seriously and will most like complain. This is just typical behavior of adolescents and I cannot argue this whatsoever. I am not opposed to the idea of partner work, but I am not completely for it. I think it would have to be done in the appropriate situation and time. It is typically not the best idea to place high school students in one group together, but I am completely cool with it.
Journal #11: Ethics/Values
I do not really have that strong of values or ethics. I have no problem with other people's values and I typically always respect what other people want to do. This is because I do not want anyone to say anything negative about my beliefs and values.
One thing I absolutely hate would have to be religion and the pressures of organized religion. I do not believe one should push their values onto someone else. This is really annoying and I do not respect this whatsoever. I do not believe in a specific organized relgion. I believe aspects of various religons can be retained and made into one's own, individual religion. This is what I follow and I do not believe anyone else has the power to push relgion upon someone else. This really angers me and I do not want to deal with this. I believe religion is contradicting and biased. This biased mentallity drives me crazy. I do not push my values and my ideals onto someone else. I also do not persecute one for their own personal belief.
Some of my ethics are pretty generic. I do not think one should lie to most people. Lying is quite ridiculous and I typically tell the truth. I usually dont lie but sometimes I slip up. This is just human nature. I also do not like spoiled people. I think it is appropriate when people have their own jobs and do not act spoiled. It is quite rude when people brag about their income and material goods. I do not respect that and I think it is really acceptable if everyone owns their own income.
So my ethics and my values are kind of generic but generally pretty common. I do not enjoy some things that people say or do. Somethings deeply annoy me but I put up with it anyways. This blog entry probably sounds really snide but I am just descring the things that really irritate me and cause me to abide by certain ideals and values.
One thing I absolutely hate would have to be religion and the pressures of organized religion. I do not believe one should push their values onto someone else. This is really annoying and I do not respect this whatsoever. I do not believe in a specific organized relgion. I believe aspects of various religons can be retained and made into one's own, individual religion. This is what I follow and I do not believe anyone else has the power to push relgion upon someone else. This really angers me and I do not want to deal with this. I believe religion is contradicting and biased. This biased mentallity drives me crazy. I do not push my values and my ideals onto someone else. I also do not persecute one for their own personal belief.
Some of my ethics are pretty generic. I do not think one should lie to most people. Lying is quite ridiculous and I typically tell the truth. I usually dont lie but sometimes I slip up. This is just human nature. I also do not like spoiled people. I think it is appropriate when people have their own jobs and do not act spoiled. It is quite rude when people brag about their income and material goods. I do not respect that and I think it is really acceptable if everyone owns their own income.
So my ethics and my values are kind of generic but generally pretty common. I do not enjoy some things that people say or do. Somethings deeply annoy me but I put up with it anyways. This blog entry probably sounds really snide but I am just descring the things that really irritate me and cause me to abide by certain ideals and values.
Wednesday, September 29, 2010
Journal #10;: Science Vs. Religion
The question of science and religion is strong and opinionated. Throughout the developing centuries, questions regarding evolution and the creation of humans have been quite strong. Many secular philosophers believe that we (human beings) have evolved. Vocalized religious supporters believe that we are solely a product of God. These two arguments have been prominent among scientific and religious study.
I personally believe in science. Science has the ability to experiment and prove a certain question or theory throughout history. Religion is a strong example of science and religion. Faith, being a connected yet fantastical belief, cannot be proven. Religion is solely based on one's belief and theory. Among this strong belief, many religious supporters oppose secular resolutions and answers to common theories. The creation of humans has been a reoccurring question throughout history. Did God create the human race? Or does science tell another story? Many disagreements and stipulations have come about because of these two questions. In the modern society, scientific reasons seem to be the more common answers to this theory. I believe one may have a strong connection with a significant figure, but human beings were not created with a simple construction. We have evolved from microscopic material in the universe. Human beings resemble modern animals in various aspects. The human race seems to contain a monkey-like quality. Various humans act in bizarre and barbaric ways. When one looks closely, our race somewhat resembles that of a contemporary monkey. Evolution is an issue among many religious and secular supporters. I believe religion plays no such part in the creation of human beings. I believe one is not born with faith; one must obtain this faith throughout life. By obtaining this faith later in life, a human being may connect themselves further with the word and actions of God. Faith is respected among various support groups, yet these religious people in society do not respect the idea of evolution. I believe there is no issue with religion and the idea of creation, but I personally support the idea of evolution rather than religious creation.
I personally believe in science. Science has the ability to experiment and prove a certain question or theory throughout history. Religion is a strong example of science and religion. Faith, being a connected yet fantastical belief, cannot be proven. Religion is solely based on one's belief and theory. Among this strong belief, many religious supporters oppose secular resolutions and answers to common theories. The creation of humans has been a reoccurring question throughout history. Did God create the human race? Or does science tell another story? Many disagreements and stipulations have come about because of these two questions. In the modern society, scientific reasons seem to be the more common answers to this theory. I believe one may have a strong connection with a significant figure, but human beings were not created with a simple construction. We have evolved from microscopic material in the universe. Human beings resemble modern animals in various aspects. The human race seems to contain a monkey-like quality. Various humans act in bizarre and barbaric ways. When one looks closely, our race somewhat resembles that of a contemporary monkey. Evolution is an issue among many religious and secular supporters. I believe religion plays no such part in the creation of human beings. I believe one is not born with faith; one must obtain this faith throughout life. By obtaining this faith later in life, a human being may connect themselves further with the word and actions of God. Faith is respected among various support groups, yet these religious people in society do not respect the idea of evolution. I believe there is no issue with religion and the idea of creation, but I personally support the idea of evolution rather than religious creation.
Monday, September 27, 2010
Tuesday, September 21, 2010
Journal #9 Organized Religion
Organized religion can be a controversial conflict among various age groups. Supporters of Christianity can have completely different views then supporters of Buddhism. Throughout history, Catholicism was used as a justifiable excuse to participate in various actions. Many classical pieces (artwork, novels, etc) had religious interpretations. The Bible, being claimed as a holy artifact, is not typically viewed as literature. Strong connections like this can determine one's satisfaction and relation to religion.
Throughout my life, I have opened my psyche to several religions. I believe every religion has a strong aspect, but one organized religion can not determine my interpretation of life and the lord. For sometime, I studied a small amount of Buddhism. Buddhism, being an enlightened and spiritual religion, captured my mind with various topics and ideals. I agreed with Siddhartha Gautama's theory, but I was unaware of the dedication and sacrifices a Buddhist must partake in. The attachment to material things was not a predicament for me, but I was unable to part with close family members and friends. Materials, such as electronics or toys, is one attachment that needs to be taken away. Buddhism allows believes the attachment to beings is a source of suffering. As much as I agree with this theory, I could not part with the ones I strongly care for; thus Buddhism was not a resolution for me.
Like government, I believe one can take various aspects of different religions. I believe traditional ideals may be retrieved from several religions. By retrieving these ideals, a personal religion may be formed. A supporter does not need an organized set of guidelines or artifact to relate to a higher power. The Bible is often seen as a symbol of one's belief in the lord. By using this as a symbol, some supporters do not believe the bible is a piece of literature. Regardless of one's religious preference, each being has an equal right to practice the religion they want to. As long as a supporter believes in their higher power, ultimate religious enlightenment may be found. If one did not believe in an organized religion, there would be nothing wrong.
Throughout my life, I have opened my psyche to several religions. I believe every religion has a strong aspect, but one organized religion can not determine my interpretation of life and the lord. For sometime, I studied a small amount of Buddhism. Buddhism, being an enlightened and spiritual religion, captured my mind with various topics and ideals. I agreed with Siddhartha Gautama's theory, but I was unaware of the dedication and sacrifices a Buddhist must partake in. The attachment to material things was not a predicament for me, but I was unable to part with close family members and friends. Materials, such as electronics or toys, is one attachment that needs to be taken away. Buddhism allows believes the attachment to beings is a source of suffering. As much as I agree with this theory, I could not part with the ones I strongly care for; thus Buddhism was not a resolution for me.
Like government, I believe one can take various aspects of different religions. I believe traditional ideals may be retrieved from several religions. By retrieving these ideals, a personal religion may be formed. A supporter does not need an organized set of guidelines or artifact to relate to a higher power. The Bible is often seen as a symbol of one's belief in the lord. By using this as a symbol, some supporters do not believe the bible is a piece of literature. Regardless of one's religious preference, each being has an equal right to practice the religion they want to. As long as a supporter believes in their higher power, ultimate religious enlightenment may be found. If one did not believe in an organized religion, there would be nothing wrong.
Friday, September 17, 2010
Journal #8: Proofreading Response
I believe the "Impotence of Proofreading" is an odd, yet somewhat comical lecture on the importance of proofreading. The speaker was quite eccentric and brought about a good point. Although it was a good point that he indeed made, I believe he put too much emphasis on poor grammar. He did not seem to explain the true importance of proofreading and fixing any grammatical errors. This lecture was slightly comical, but almost too far fetched. I believe the speaker could have lessened the amount of errors in his discussion. He did not have a sufficient amount of knowledge on truly proofreading a piece. By not providing this knowledge, the lecture was somewhat fruitless. The speaker had also used too much comedy in his speech. If he lessened the amount of comedy used in his piece, he would obtain more respect and satisfaction from the lecture. The audience quite enjoyed his lecture, which was good, but I do not believe they walked out with any new knowledge of proofreading and grammatical errors. By not explaining the importance of this, the speaker's lecture was almost pointless.
I myself thought the discussion was slightly comical. Although I thought it was funny, I believe he put too many grammatical errors in the lecture. After listening to his discussion, I am now more aware of any grammatical errors. Because of this, I believe the speaker's discussion was somewhat of a success. Although I believe he succeeded in bringing about some commonly used errors, he did not seem to succeed in discussing various solutions to these problems. I believe his incorporation of suggestive themes seemed to break the ice a bit. By breaking this ice, his audience was not offended by the material and seemed to relax themselves a bit. I believe his use of these themes were quite successful. Although the speaker was quite entertaining, I do not believe he was successful in his attempt to resolve any issues among proofreading. He provided the audience with adequate knowledge of the errors, but he did not aid in any resolutions to these problems.
I myself thought the discussion was slightly comical. Although I thought it was funny, I believe he put too many grammatical errors in the lecture. After listening to his discussion, I am now more aware of any grammatical errors. Because of this, I believe the speaker's discussion was somewhat of a success. Although I believe he succeeded in bringing about some commonly used errors, he did not seem to succeed in discussing various solutions to these problems. I believe his incorporation of suggestive themes seemed to break the ice a bit. By breaking this ice, his audience was not offended by the material and seemed to relax themselves a bit. I believe his use of these themes were quite successful. Although the speaker was quite entertaining, I do not believe he was successful in his attempt to resolve any issues among proofreading. He provided the audience with adequate knowledge of the errors, but he did not aid in any resolutions to these problems.
Wednesday, September 15, 2010
Journal #7: Superstitions
I am not a prominent believer of superstitions and obscure ideals. My response toward them is somewhat neutral. I believe one can stand with these superstitions. It is not illogical or absurd to believe in certain rituals or superstitions. One common one would be cemetaries and the holding of one's breath. While passing by a cemetary, it is a superstition to hold your breath to prevent any spirits that would enter your body. I do not know the origin of this belief, but it sounds somewhat Native. Many Native Americans believed in various rituals to carry on one's spirit. These rituals or beliefs may have carried into the twenty first century. When I was younger, I did believe this absurd superstition. Although i believed it when I was younger, I do not feel a connection with that belief now. Besides that specific superstition, I did not seem to follow anything else.
I do in fact believe in paranormal activity. I am not sure if paranormal events are classified as "superstitious," but I feel as if we are not alone. I believe certain spirits linger in this world in order to gain some sort of closure. This closure is often not obtained unless a significant figure in Christianity can perform some sort of ritual. I believe paranormal figures are all around us. Some may stay connected to specific human beings. These specific beings could potentially be family members or strong friends. Some people often speak of paranormal experiences or unexplainable interactions with another dimension. I believe spirits do not try to make contact with present day inhabitants because they are risidual, and therefore do not have the knowledge of their death. The spirits could potentially interact with beings due to unaware encounters. But I do not believe most spirits are demonic and violent. The majority of spirits will not try to harm one in anyway. Because of this, I believe humans should not be too terrified of paranormal figures.
Although I do not believe in traditional superstitions, I do believe in paranormal activity in our world. I do not feel it is something to be scared of or worry about.
I do in fact believe in paranormal activity. I am not sure if paranormal events are classified as "superstitious," but I feel as if we are not alone. I believe certain spirits linger in this world in order to gain some sort of closure. This closure is often not obtained unless a significant figure in Christianity can perform some sort of ritual. I believe paranormal figures are all around us. Some may stay connected to specific human beings. These specific beings could potentially be family members or strong friends. Some people often speak of paranormal experiences or unexplainable interactions with another dimension. I believe spirits do not try to make contact with present day inhabitants because they are risidual, and therefore do not have the knowledge of their death. The spirits could potentially interact with beings due to unaware encounters. But I do not believe most spirits are demonic and violent. The majority of spirits will not try to harm one in anyway. Because of this, I believe humans should not be too terrified of paranormal figures.
Although I do not believe in traditional superstitions, I do believe in paranormal activity in our world. I do not feel it is something to be scared of or worry about.
Monday, September 13, 2010
Journal #6: Repercussions
In The Crucible, various characters in the novel seem to blame other minor townspeople for the demonic rituals being held. Abigail seems to deny any involvement in the activities. Her fear has taken over and she worries of an unfortunate resolution. This unfortunate resolution would be death by hanging. Although Abigail blames Parris's slave for the events, I can almost respect her decision. She fears death and believes there is no alternative. Although I can sympathize with her, I do not believe she should have pointed the finger at Titabu. This reaction was irrational and quite uncalled for. After I learned of Abigail's affair with John Proctor, I did not respect her decision anymore. She is manipulative and deceptive. This behavior could cost her a fulfilling life. I no longer sympathize with her decision because she wrongfully blamed a completely innocent bystander. She felt, because of her social status, that it would be acceptable to blame Titabu.
Throughout the novel, chaotic events have occurred. Multiple characters have fought with each other and have tried to establish an unforgiving turn of events. The witch trials in New Salem have brought about chaos and careless displays of religious discrimination. The characters in the novel cannot seem to forgive anyone who participates in secular activities. Their punishment is decided as death and there is no alternative option.
After Abigail is discovered with a needle in her stomach, it is speculated that Elizabeth has placed rituals upon Abigail. The young witch, of course, has knowingly placed the needle inside of herself in order to establish an ongoing relationship with John Proctor. Because of this framing, I speculate that Abigail will suffer some unfortunate punishments. After discovering the truth of the framing, I do not feel that Abigail has any good intentions in her life. All of the characters in The Crucible seem to associate any foreign activity with witchcraft. Because of this, the town of New Salem has suffered some hopeless attacks and accusations. The characters who have placed blame upon the other townspeople will discover the severity of their actions.
Throughout the novel, chaotic events have occurred. Multiple characters have fought with each other and have tried to establish an unforgiving turn of events. The witch trials in New Salem have brought about chaos and careless displays of religious discrimination. The characters in the novel cannot seem to forgive anyone who participates in secular activities. Their punishment is decided as death and there is no alternative option.
After Abigail is discovered with a needle in her stomach, it is speculated that Elizabeth has placed rituals upon Abigail. The young witch, of course, has knowingly placed the needle inside of herself in order to establish an ongoing relationship with John Proctor. Because of this framing, I speculate that Abigail will suffer some unfortunate punishments. After discovering the truth of the framing, I do not feel that Abigail has any good intentions in her life. All of the characters in The Crucible seem to associate any foreign activity with witchcraft. Because of this, the town of New Salem has suffered some hopeless attacks and accusations. The characters who have placed blame upon the other townspeople will discover the severity of their actions.
Thursday, September 9, 2010
Journal #5 Punishment
Discipline, or punishment, seems to be an overlooked subject in the American society. Parents are often misguided when disciplining their children. Structure and punishment coexist. Many parents believe in a strong, tight disciplinary style. These children can often be classified as sheltered. Living in a sheltered life enables the child to connect with his or her family. Although it seems important to incoporate family into one's life, relationships and life experiences should be embraced. Sheltered children are unable to meet friends or communicate with the ones they do have. Facebook and other social networking sites have constructed fear into the minds of many parents. Many feel these social networking sights contain harmful material or people. Although many who oppose these sites have a relevant point, Facebook is used for relationships and communication. Many young children have the knowledge of harmful situations and seem to distance themselves from these predicaments.
In the modern society, Facebook is becoming a form of punishment. Because of the site's social prominence, many young members adhere themselves to the social networking life. Parents oppose this adherence and would like to see their children retreat from the site. Various members whitewash their personal information. Status updates, age, and photos are often blocked. By having this option, parents can trust the site a little more. But this does not change the disciplinary actions being taken.
Cell phones are also significant devices in an adolescent's life. By taking away his or her cell phone, the children get upset with their parents. This is similar to Facebook. Many children become infatuated with cell phones. Not having a cell phone at a young age seems quite odd in the modern society.
I believe a lot of the disciplinary actions are relevant and commendable. Because teenagers are interested in technology, a good way of punishing them would be taking away their Facebook or cell phone privileges. Parenthood has adapted throughout the generations. These disciplinary actions are not uncommon due to technology's prominence in the modern society. I agree with all the various punishments being used today.
In the modern society, Facebook is becoming a form of punishment. Because of the site's social prominence, many young members adhere themselves to the social networking life. Parents oppose this adherence and would like to see their children retreat from the site. Various members whitewash their personal information. Status updates, age, and photos are often blocked. By having this option, parents can trust the site a little more. But this does not change the disciplinary actions being taken.
Cell phones are also significant devices in an adolescent's life. By taking away his or her cell phone, the children get upset with their parents. This is similar to Facebook. Many children become infatuated with cell phones. Not having a cell phone at a young age seems quite odd in the modern society.
I believe a lot of the disciplinary actions are relevant and commendable. Because teenagers are interested in technology, a good way of punishing them would be taking away their Facebook or cell phone privileges. Parenthood has adapted throughout the generations. These disciplinary actions are not uncommon due to technology's prominence in the modern society. I agree with all the various punishments being used today.
Tuesday, September 7, 2010
Journal #4 Traveling Experience
I have not had that much traveling experience in my life. Although I have not flown to various states, I want to visit some. California, being a very vibrant and unique state, is quite appealing to me. I would love to see the various characters and scenery in that state. The music scene is also quite heavy in California, which would deeply appeal to me. Because I was born near Chicago, I enjoy being around large cities and fast paced areas. Chicago is only natural to me and I would not mind returning to Chicago later in my life. My political interests have also inspired me to move to Washington D.C. D.C. would aid in my infatuation with politics and government. I believe the originality and integrity the political state contains is quite intriguing and unique. Although I would enjoy visiting or residing in these areas, I’m not sure if I could easily leave Springfield. It has become my home and has fed my adaptions throughout the years.
I have visited very little places in the United States. I have been to Florida and Michigan. Florida did not heavily appeal to me. Although the state had many interesting sights and activities, it revolved around southern traditions. I did not enjoy the alligator hunting the state seemed so proud of. After eating at a southern restaurant, I realized how traditional Florida was. While in Florida, I went to Universal Studios, which was quite interesting. I enjoyed seeing all the attractions but was not impressed with some of the activities they had. After that, I did not really do much else. The trip was redundant and fattening. My inability to leave my comfort zone aided in the negative aspects of the trip.
I would love to leave the country and visit various countries. Europe seems quite interesting to me. All the characters and originality of the countries are really infatuating. It would be quite amazing to visit other countries. Although I have not traveled much, I am not a big fan of it. I would not mind visiting other places though.
I have visited very little places in the United States. I have been to Florida and Michigan. Florida did not heavily appeal to me. Although the state had many interesting sights and activities, it revolved around southern traditions. I did not enjoy the alligator hunting the state seemed so proud of. After eating at a southern restaurant, I realized how traditional Florida was. While in Florida, I went to Universal Studios, which was quite interesting. I enjoyed seeing all the attractions but was not impressed with some of the activities they had. After that, I did not really do much else. The trip was redundant and fattening. My inability to leave my comfort zone aided in the negative aspects of the trip.
I would love to leave the country and visit various countries. Europe seems quite interesting to me. All the characters and originality of the countries are really infatuating. It would be quite amazing to visit other countries. Although I have not traveled much, I am not a big fan of it. I would not mind visiting other places though.
Journal #3 Hostage Situation (Absent)
I do not know how I would react in a hostage situation because it has never happened to me. I do not know my emotions in that problem. I have seen various movies or read various novels with hostage situations in them. I hope I would not run across that unfortunate problem in my life.
I'm guessing I would not put myself in a harmful situation. I am aware of the dangers in life, but I believe I could potentially get caught off guard. Because I was orn in the suburbs of Chicago, I often dealt with paranoia when walking around in the city. I constantly watch my environment and anyone behind of around me. I ignore any homeless or strange characters on the street. Sometimes I take alternative streets in order to lose any creepy or sketch people. By knowing my surroundings, I can epect an attack or possible hostage situation. I do not know why one would take me hostage, because I am not a rich heir or anything of that sort. But i do place my wallet in my front pocket to prevent any confrontations in the city.
If I did, for some reason, get taken hostage, I would try to vocalize my struggles as much as possible, and if that does not work, I would try to reach a phone or communication device. If the criminal takes away any communication, I believe I would try self defense. I would not quit in a harmful situation like that. I do not want to get severely harmed. I am not that strong, but I believe I could potentially defend myself. By defending myself, I can prevent any bad situations. i wish I was as strong as a superhero, or possibly Jackie Chan. If I knew an awesome fighting style, I could defend myself against any criminals. I would also hope that authorities would try to aid in my release. That would make me feel horrible if no one was able to help me out. I would be extremely scared in a hostage situation, but I would hope that I could make it out completely alive.
I'm guessing I would not put myself in a harmful situation. I am aware of the dangers in life, but I believe I could potentially get caught off guard. Because I was orn in the suburbs of Chicago, I often dealt with paranoia when walking around in the city. I constantly watch my environment and anyone behind of around me. I ignore any homeless or strange characters on the street. Sometimes I take alternative streets in order to lose any creepy or sketch people. By knowing my surroundings, I can epect an attack or possible hostage situation. I do not know why one would take me hostage, because I am not a rich heir or anything of that sort. But i do place my wallet in my front pocket to prevent any confrontations in the city.
If I did, for some reason, get taken hostage, I would try to vocalize my struggles as much as possible, and if that does not work, I would try to reach a phone or communication device. If the criminal takes away any communication, I believe I would try self defense. I would not quit in a harmful situation like that. I do not want to get severely harmed. I am not that strong, but I believe I could potentially defend myself. By defending myself, I can prevent any bad situations. i wish I was as strong as a superhero, or possibly Jackie Chan. If I knew an awesome fighting style, I could defend myself against any criminals. I would also hope that authorities would try to aid in my release. That would make me feel horrible if no one was able to help me out. I would be extremely scared in a hostage situation, but I would hope that I could make it out completely alive.
Tuesday, August 31, 2010
Journal #2: A Ridiculous Hospitallity Story
Because I have been interested in squirrels recently, this short story about hospitality and manners will involve a couple of squirrels, one being extremely obese. This unrealistic story is based off of a few drawings that my friend and I creatively made. It is an extremely terrible story but I will post it anyways.
The first squirrel, Jesse Lacey, is roughly 100 pounds. He has a furry gut that overwhelms his vision and breathing capabilities. Although the squirrel has a hard time sustaining life, he seems quite happy. His life revolves around sleeping and eating massive amounts of food. His favorite food would have to be cake. He does not leave a single crumb on the large platter.
Jesse Lacey has a brother that weighs 94 pounds less than him. His name is Connor. Connor is a really creative squirrel who enjoys long walks in the afternoon. His weight is quite standard for a squirrel. Unfortunately his favorite food is cake. This is a large problem due to Jesse Lacey's massive infatuation with cake.
One day, a ridiculous T-Rex was baking awesome cake. Jesse Lacey smelled the delicious cake from three miles away. At the time, Jesse was outside of his tree home playing football with Connor. Connor smelt the awesome cake as well. They both began to leap toward the trees in the direction of the cake.
The three mile journey consisted of fire breathing dragons and mountain climbing. When the two rival brothers made it to the gigantic mountain, Connor believed he had the upper hand. He was small and quick, whereas Jesse was large and quite slow. Connor then took out a gigantic jet pack from his fanny pack. He strapped it on and began to fly. Just then, a roaring, whipping sound entered the mountain side. Connor looked to his left and Jesse was flying a massive helicopter. Connor was forcefully thrown to the ground from the massive helicopter.
Jesse finally made his way to the top of the mountain. He greeted the T-Rex and then took off with the cake. He flew to the bottom of the mountain where Connor was sitting down. Jesse saw the sadness in his eyes and decided it would be respectful if he gave his brother the large cake. Jesse and Connor began to share their love of cake after that ridiculously unrealistic day.
The first squirrel, Jesse Lacey, is roughly 100 pounds. He has a furry gut that overwhelms his vision and breathing capabilities. Although the squirrel has a hard time sustaining life, he seems quite happy. His life revolves around sleeping and eating massive amounts of food. His favorite food would have to be cake. He does not leave a single crumb on the large platter.
Jesse Lacey has a brother that weighs 94 pounds less than him. His name is Connor. Connor is a really creative squirrel who enjoys long walks in the afternoon. His weight is quite standard for a squirrel. Unfortunately his favorite food is cake. This is a large problem due to Jesse Lacey's massive infatuation with cake.
One day, a ridiculous T-Rex was baking awesome cake. Jesse Lacey smelled the delicious cake from three miles away. At the time, Jesse was outside of his tree home playing football with Connor. Connor smelt the awesome cake as well. They both began to leap toward the trees in the direction of the cake.
The three mile journey consisted of fire breathing dragons and mountain climbing. When the two rival brothers made it to the gigantic mountain, Connor believed he had the upper hand. He was small and quick, whereas Jesse was large and quite slow. Connor then took out a gigantic jet pack from his fanny pack. He strapped it on and began to fly. Just then, a roaring, whipping sound entered the mountain side. Connor looked to his left and Jesse was flying a massive helicopter. Connor was forcefully thrown to the ground from the massive helicopter.
Jesse finally made his way to the top of the mountain. He greeted the T-Rex and then took off with the cake. He flew to the bottom of the mountain where Connor was sitting down. Jesse saw the sadness in his eyes and decided it would be respectful if he gave his brother the large cake. Jesse and Connor began to share their love of cake after that ridiculously unrealistic day.
Friday, August 27, 2010
Journal #1:Native American Culture
I know the traditional basics of Native American culture. Diseases and wrongful actions seemed to be common hardships many Native Americans faced. Throughout the early settlements, many Spanish or European explorers wrongfully deceived the native people. These people were unaware of the future they would soon face.
I believe the native people enjoyed the new settlers company at first. They did not have any prior knowledge of the language and customs the settlers partook in. This can be related to various ethnicity groups in the contemporary society. Many racial groups do not understand opposite ethnicity's traditions. Many often label these racial groups with stereotypical humor and preconceived notions. I believe the native people's struggle with language and culture can be related to modern racial groups.
The new settlers often used sign language or alternative forms of communication to interact with the Native Americans. Communication was eventually met in the middle and the two groups could coexist. Although it seemed that these groups would coexist with each other, they did not agree with various customs over time. Many settlers tried to persuade the natives to take part in christian customs. Many natives were opposed to this but some agreed. Native American traders seemed more open to the idea of Christianity. This is partly due to their strong interactions with new settlers. Over time, many explorers began to control the native people and convert their traditional values. Native American culture began to deteriorate in this time period.
Many Native Americans began to lash out on the new settlers. Multiple battles and arguments erupted due to the contrasts in cultures. In Mexico, many Spanish explorers deceived the native people. The explorers claimed they were gods. The strong civilizations believed this lie. This lie would soon lead to massive destruction and the dilapidation of Mexican empires. Although the Mexican civilizations were intelligent and strong, they had no prior knowledge of the battles they would soon face.
I do not have extensive knowledge of Native American traditions but I know of many hardships and battles many native people endured.
I believe the native people enjoyed the new settlers company at first. They did not have any prior knowledge of the language and customs the settlers partook in. This can be related to various ethnicity groups in the contemporary society. Many racial groups do not understand opposite ethnicity's traditions. Many often label these racial groups with stereotypical humor and preconceived notions. I believe the native people's struggle with language and culture can be related to modern racial groups.
The new settlers often used sign language or alternative forms of communication to interact with the Native Americans. Communication was eventually met in the middle and the two groups could coexist. Although it seemed that these groups would coexist with each other, they did not agree with various customs over time. Many settlers tried to persuade the natives to take part in christian customs. Many natives were opposed to this but some agreed. Native American traders seemed more open to the idea of Christianity. This is partly due to their strong interactions with new settlers. Over time, many explorers began to control the native people and convert their traditional values. Native American culture began to deteriorate in this time period.
Many Native Americans began to lash out on the new settlers. Multiple battles and arguments erupted due to the contrasts in cultures. In Mexico, many Spanish explorers deceived the native people. The explorers claimed they were gods. The strong civilizations believed this lie. This lie would soon lead to massive destruction and the dilapidation of Mexican empires. Although the Mexican civilizations were intelligent and strong, they had no prior knowledge of the battles they would soon face.
I do not have extensive knowledge of Native American traditions but I know of many hardships and battles many native people endured.
Thursday, August 26, 2010
Symbolism in The Catcher in the Rye
The Catcher in the Rye contained a lot of symbolism. Holden Caulfield lacked religious preferences and was often unaware of any spiritual resolutions. This of course is the thought process of J.D. Salinger himself. Salinger did not like the use of religious resolutions in his novel. The Catcher in the Rye was radical for its time because it did not meet the standard of traditional novels; it exceeded the standards.
Symbolism seems to be used in several aspects of the novel. The two nuns in the novel seem to represent Salinger's disagreement with religion. Although he did not believe in religious uses in his novel, Salinger made sure the two nuns did not suffer any struggles in the novel. I believe Salinger used these characters to respect one's religious preferences.
Another symbol throughout the novel, seems to be the people Caulfield encounters. These people lack any kind of personality or sympathy. I believe these characters are symbols conformity and social suffocation. By using these characters, Salinger successfully makes his point on conformity and people's lack of personality throughout the novel. I believe Salinger was effective in creating a novel in which many could relate with.
Monday, August 23, 2010
Quotes 4
“Stay at my house if you like, bird…I am sorry I cannot hoist the sail and take you in with the small breeze that is rising. But I am with a friend.”
This quote is quite amusing. I believe the quote is amusing because Santiago is interacting with the bird. He speaks to the bird as if he is speaking to a human being. I enjoy this interaction because it shows Santiago’s compassion and love for others in the world. This is another style used by Hemingway to intrigue his audience. I think Hemingway is effective in doing this. Although the characters are quite amusing, Hemingway created a somewhat imaginative environment with the various characters in the novel. I believe this quote is infatuating because Santiago is treating the bird fairly. He even offers to be a host or friend if the bird needs one. This is somewhat comical because the bird cannot obviously do regular human being activities. With this conversation, Santiago seems to long for a companion. He also brings up the fact that he is struggling with the large marlin. The fact that he brings up his struggle with the fish makes the situation more appealing. I like how Santiago is being compassionate toward the other creatures on the sea. This displays his kind hearted and friendly personality.
Hemingway used the character of Santiago to show a compassionate and loyal aspect of the novel. His purpose in the novel was very effective and it made the sea less redundant and humdrum. I believe Santiago used his nice personality to gain friends. I am surprised that Santiago is as compassionate and friendly as he is. Most people who are taunted on a daily basis are not as friendly and loyal as Santiago is. This good attitude that Santiago displays makes the novel more friendly and appealing. I believe Santiago is lonely on the sea and he uses the creatures around him to feed his loneliness. This quote is effective at showing the imaginative side to the novel.
Quotes 3
“I wish the boy was here.”
Throughout the novel, Santiago wishes that his young companion, Manolin, was on the fishing trip with him. Santiago insisted that Manolin stay behind because he did not want the boy to get hurt or endangered. I believe it is courageous that Manolin insisted on coming with Santiago on the trip. Although Manolin was not allowed to fish with Santiago anymore, the boy continues to ask Santiago if he could come with. I like how Manolin enjoys fishing and helping the old man out. I believe this is noble and he should be commended for his loyalty and respect toward Santiago.
"If you’re not tired, fish…you must be very strange."
I enjoy this quote for several reasons. The fish has become a prominent character throughout the novel. Because of his purpose in the novel, Santiago begins to interact and communicate with the fish. I enjoy this quote because he talks to the fish. After being around him for quite some time, I believe Santiago began to enjoy the fish and their struggle. This aspect of the novel makes it quite intriguing and entertaining. I believe the loyalty toward the fish is quite amusing.
Another reason why I enjoy this quote would have to be because of the struggle the fish and Santiago had to endure. This ongoing battle seemed to take a lot of energy from both parties. When the old man asks the fish why he is not tired, it seems to show how much struggle and strength was put into the battle between the fish and the old man. Although the battle is amusing and exciting, readers may feel tired and worn out as well. I believe this is due to Hemingway’s effective imagery and descriptive language. This language allows the readers to feel as if they are truly inside of the novel. I believe this quote signifies the struggle and long battle that the fish and the old man had to endure.
Quotes 2
“I would like to take the great DiMaggio fishing…They say his father was a fisherman. Maybe he was as poor as we are and would understand.”
I believe this quote is important to the novel. The quote shows some of Santiago’s sentimentality. As well as the quote’s sentimentality, it also shows a significant figure in Santiago’s life which is quite odd because his character is so reserved and focused on his occupation. I enjoy this quote because of its emotions and its ability to unlock doors in the world of the Old Man and the Sea.
Santiago is a reserved fisherman who does not seem to admire anyone. After reading this line, I was surprised that Santiago had actually found someone who he truly admired and respected. Joe DiMaggio seems to be Santiago’s childhood hero. He also enjoys the face that DiMaggio’s father was a fisherman as well. I believe this relation makes Santiago feel more comfortable about his position in society. Santiago does not feel that it is negative to be a fisherman because the great Joe DiMaggio’s father was one. I enjoy this because I feel that Santiago needs more self confidence and pride in himself and his occupation.
This quote shows that Santiago feels emotions and happiness. Throughout the novel, Santiago daydreams of DiMaggio. He dreams of DiMaggio aboard his ship helping out. I believe Santiago needs some company during the duration of the catch. He deserves some company and these dreams seem to give him that company. I also enjoy the fact that Santiago has a strong admiration toward a specific being. This is quite intriguing because he seems to not care for anyone or anything but his fishing. I believe this quote shows another side to Santiago which is quite important to the characters personality. Santiago is reserved and seems to have no emotions. With this line, readers gain a new perception of the old fisherman and his unfortunate life.
Hemingway
Hemingway’s work was brilliant and imaginative. He was able to write his novel with confidence and simplistic structure. His imagery allowed him to create a realistic world in which various characters inhabited. I believe Hemingway wrote his final novel with brilliance and realism.
During the duration of the novel, Hemingway does not disappoint when it comes to imagery. He writes about all the surrounding objects and characters encountered throughout the novel. The sea is described so well that readers feel as if they are truly in the world Hemingway created for the old man. Hemingway wanted to allow readers to connect with the characters and environment in the novel. Hemingway ensured the novel’s consistency and cohesive structure. The novel remained simple yet descriptive to the last page of the novel. He made sure to keep the novel from turning into too much or going off of topic.
Santiago, the kind hearted fisherman, seemed to gain Hemingway a large support. Many readers felt sympathy for the old man and his struggling life. Throughout the novel, the audience is enticed in the hardships and battles Santiago seemed to face. By killing off the marlin in the end, Hemingway created a theme or message which was not expected in the initial thoughts of the novel.
Hemingway’s writing style allows the novel to sustain a healthy life in American Literature. Throughout the literary community, many readers have been influenced by Hemingway’s imaginative style. He delivered his novels with strong imagery and sympathetic characters. Characters such as the marlin, the bird, and the sharks allow the readers to gain a new perspective of characters in a novel. Animals are typically not prominent characters in a novel. I believe these companions are important aspects to the novel’s success. The novel could not have been as popular if it did not contain odd characters and actions. Without the marlin, the novel would lack purpose and a theme. Without the sharks, the novel could not resolve itself on its own momentum.
Old Man and the Sea Conflict
In the Old Man and the Sea, the conflict could be multiple things. Santiago is a starving fisherman who cannot seem to make enough money to support himself. His former partner, Manolin, is one of the only fulfilling constant in Santiago’s life. By having this constant, Santiago gains more courage and slight happiness. His loneliness does not seem to take over.
Santiago is a failing fisherman who has been unable to catch a fish in eighty seven days. Because of this, Santiago has no hope in his future as a fisherman. Many readers feel sympathy toward the old man and his fruitless attempts at survival on the sea. After Santiago realizes his poor situation, he decides to change it. He decides to go and make something out of himself. He embarks on a life-altering journey. He explains to his young companion that he cannot allow him to go. Manolin is upset by this demand but tells the old man that he will help him out whenever he needs help. This loyalty and passion show that the boy is serious about his companionship and fishing.
Once on the sea, Santiago quickly hooks a large fish. He is unaware of the fish’s size but he believes it is a large fish. He does not know the size of the marlin until later. Unable to reel in the marlin, Santiago begins to struggle with him for several days. The battle has little rest and Santiago is determined to successfully catch the large fish. I believe the ongoing struggles to find a living and catch the marlin seems to be prominent conflicts in the novel. Santiago has to catch the marlin to rebuild his occupation and life. That is why his struggle with the fish is so fierce and determined. It is quite unfortunate that sharks take away Santiago’s golden opportunity but everything happens for a reason. I believe Santiago realized he accomplished his goal and can accomplish higher goals with the help of his loyal partner. He unfortunately took Manolin for granted in the beginning of the novel.
The Sharks
The sharks became a large threat to the fish and the old man throughout the novel. If it weren’t for the sharks, the old man could have gotten his large marlin and he could have gained a larger reputation. Although it was disheartening to watch Santiago’s goal be taken away, it is out of one’s control to steer the sharks away from the fish.
I was beginning to enjoy the struggle between the fish and the old man. The old man protected the fish as if it were his child. He did this to ensure that his catch would be perfect and unharmed. Although many can claim that Santiago protected the fish for food or respect, I believe he also gained a relationship with the fish. Without the fish, Santiago would have no struggle or companion. His lowliness on the sea made him begin speaking to animals such as birds and fish. This loneliness is discouraging, yet readers continue on.
Once the sharks entered the story, the theme changed. Many readers were unhappy with the shark’s involvement in the catch but it gave readers entertainment and a bit of excitement. Because of this excitement, readers continued on with the novel and did not stray away from the ongoing battle between the fish, the old man, and now the ravenous sharks. Although the excitement was nice at first, the reality of the sharks placement in the novel set in. Many readers knew the marlin’s fate. The fate was unfortunately inevitable. After the fish’s death, Santiago thinks of the many sharks the marlin had once killed. This gives a key to the marlin’s strength and size. One almost feels sympathy for the marlin because he was held captive by the old fisherman. If he were not venerable, he could easily defeat the colony of sharks attacking him. I believe the sharks symbolized death and fear, but brought about a new leaf. Without the sharks, Santiago would not be able to realize his future and the purpose of his journey.
The Marlin
I enjoy the marlins placement in the novel. The large fish acts as multiple things in the novel. The fish acts as a goal or target throughout the novel. The marlin seems to be Santiago’s goal and wish during his journey. He made the journey to catch the magnificent creature and he will not allow the fish to retreat from his grasps. Although Santiago would like to catch the marlin, he seems to protect it and nurture it throughout the novel. He believes it is his duty to protect the magnificent fish and he will not let any other creature or force of nature take it away. I believe he is completely devoted to his fish and will not let his companions down.
I enjoy the marlin because he seems to be another character in the novel. The novel lacks characters and the marlin is just like another human. It goes through similar hardships and unfortunately dies in the end. The death of the fish is discouraging and some could say even fruitless. The fact that the fish dies in the end makes the trip almost completely worthless. After readers realize that Santiago caught the fish and accomplished his goal, the death is not as discouraging. Like a character in a novel, the marlin suffers fatal blows. He is slowly attacked by large amounts of sharks. This slow death disheartens readers and many can find sympathy for the fish and the old man. The old man did not seem too happy about the marlin’s death, yet he dragged the extremely large skeleton up to shore and he gained much respect from the fish. The marlin can somewhat symbolize hope and respect. Without the large fish, Santiago would not gain hope of living a sturdy life as a fisherman. Without the large fish, Santiago would not gain respect from his fellow companions. The marlin’s skeleton created great things for Santiago. The relationship between Santiago and Manolin was strengthened by the tireless journey.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)